1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
|
# Baserock Definitions schema, version -1
# This ontology teases out a simple formal model of the data represention
# aspect of the Baserock definitions format (v5).
#
# It's not a great example of an ontology, because it models a generic problem
# using terms and a data model tied closely to how a couple of specific tools
# work. In future we need to produce a more general-purpose model. I hope
# this schema is a useful step towards doing that.
# Things you can do with this:
# Check it is valid:
# rapper -i turtle baserock-owl-schema.turtle
#
# Visualise it in a rubbish way:
# rapper -i turtle -o dot baserock-owl-schema.turtle | dot -Tpng > schema.png
#
# Edit with Protégé:
# just open it in protege, it can save to Turtle format as well but will lose
# comments and formatting.
## Entities
@prefix : <http://baserock.org/definitions/example-schema#> .
@prefix owl: <http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#> .
@prefix rdfs: <http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#> .
@prefix rdf: <http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#> .
@prefix xsd: <http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#> .
:Morphology a owl:Class .
:Cluster a owl:Class ;
rdfs:subClassOf :morphology .
:SystemDeployment a owl:Class .
:System a owl:Class ;
rdfs:subClassOf :morphology .
:Stratum a owl:Class ;
rdfs:subClassOf :morphology .
:ChunkReference a owl:Class .
:Chunk a owl:Class ;
rdfs:subClassOf :morphology .
## Shared properties
:hasName a owl:DatatypeProperty , owl:FunctionalProperty ;
rdfs:domain :Morphology ;
rdfs:range xsd:string .
:hasDescription a owl:DatatypeProperty , owl:FunctionalProperty ;
rdfs:domain :Morphology ;
rdfs:range xsd:string .
## Cluster-specific properties
:containsSystemDeployment a owl:ObjectProperty ;
rdfs:domain :Cluster ;
rdfs:range :SystemDeployment .
## SystemDeployment-specific properties
:deploysSystem a owl:ObjectProperty , owl:FunctionalProperty ;
rdfs:domain :SystemDeployment ;
rdfs:range :System .
:hasLabel a owl:DatatypeProperty , owl:FunctionalProperty ;
rdfs:domain :SystemDeployment ;
rdfs:range xsd:string .
:hasType a owl:DatatypeProperty , owl:FunctionalProperty ;
rdfs:domain :SystemDeployment ;
rdfs:range xsd:string .
:hasLocation a owl:DatatypeProperty , owl:FunctionalProperty ;
rdfs:domain :SystemDeployment ;
rdfs:range xsd:string .
# FIXME: this is actually a key-value mapping, how do you do that?
:hasConfigurationSetting a owl:DatatypeProperty ;
rdfs:domain :SystemDeployment ;
rdfs:range xsd:string .
## System-specific properties
:containsStratum a owl:ObjectProperty ;
rdfs:domain :System ;
rdfs:range :Stratum .
:hasArchitecture a owl:DatatypeProperty, owl:FunctionalProperty ;
rdfs:domain :System ;
rdfs:range xsd:string .
:hasConfigurationExtension a owl:DatatypeProperty ;
rdfs:domain :System ;
rdfs:range xsd:string .
## Stratum-specific properties
:hasStratumBuildDependency a owl:ObjectProperty ;
rdfs:domain :Stratum ;
rdfs:range :Stratum .
:containsChunkReference a owl:ObjectProperty ;
rdfs:domain :Stratum ;
rdfs:range :Chunk .
## ChunkReference-specific properties
:refersToChunk a owl:ObjectProperty , owl:FunctionalProperty ;
rdfs:domain :ChunkReference ;
rdfs:range :Chunk .
:repo a owl:DatatypeProperty , owl:FunctionalProperty ;
rdfs:domain :ChunkReference ;
rdfs:range xsd:string .
:ref a owl:DatatypeProperty , owl:FunctionalProperty ;
rdfs:domain :ChunkReference ;
rdfs:range xsd:string .
:unpetrifyRef a owl:DatatypeProperty , owl:FunctionalProperty ;
rdfs:domain :ChunkReference ;
rdfs:range xsd:string .
:hasChunkBuildDependency a owl:ObjectProperty ;
rdfs:domain :ChunkReference ;
rdfs:range :Chunk .
## Chunk-specific properties
# build-system isn't included here, as it overlaps with the *-commands
# fields in an unfortunate way.
# FIXME: how do you do lists ??
|
