baserock/baserock/definitions.git - gitlab.com: baserock/definitions.git

	Commit message (Collapse)	Author	Age	Files	Lines
*	Explicitly separate linux chunk names for bsp variants	Richard Maw	2014-06-12	1	-2/+2
\| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \|	Simplifying 'morph edit' syntax showed that we have several different versions of the chunk called 'linux'. This patch versions of linux to match what they are for. This patch was originally written by Paul Sherwood, but the name of the morphology also has to be set in the chunk morphology, so wasn't sufficient by itself. Instead of making the changes in the 7 kernel trees that we had, they have now all been merged into one, hence the sha1s and refs have also been updated.
*	Add FB_VESA to the kernel of x86 bsp	Pedro Alvarez	2014-04-04	1	-1/+1
\|
*	Change linux kernel refs to include virtualisation config	Lars Wirzenius	2014-03-28	1	-1/+1
\|
*	Petrify Masterbaserock/danielsilverstone/petrify-all	Daniel Silverstone	2014-03-26	1	-3/+6
\|
*	Re-order system and stratum morphology fields.	Richard Maw	2014-02-17	1	-12/+12
\| \| \| \|	This is the new canonical ordering.
*	remove all null repos/refs	Paul Sherwood	2014-02-17	1	-2/+0
\|
*	Changed ref:master and repo:baserock:baserock/morphs to ref:null and ↵	Daniel Firth	2014-01-15	1	-2/+2
\| \| \| \|	repo:null respectively
*	Delete genivi-staging and reorder morph contents	Jonathan Maw	2013-09-30	1	-14/+14
\|
*	Replace JSON morphologies with YAML.	Richard Maw	2013-07-02	1	-34/+22
\|
*	Fix up refs after merge	Sam Thursfield	2013-03-15	1	-1/+1
\| \| \| \|	I'm not sure how these got lost.
*	Set refs for system branch	Sam Thursfield	2013-03-14	1	-1/+1
\|
*	Merge the GENIVI baseline morphs	Jonathan Maw	2013-03-01	1	-1/+3
\|
*	Fix refs to be correct, instead of to Sam's branch	Lars Wirzenius	2013-01-28	1	-1/+1
\| \| \| \|	I failed to do this when merging. Mea culpa.
*	Add correct build-depends to BSP strata	Sam Thursfield	2013-01-28	1	-0/+7
\|
*	Create x86_32 system variants	Sam Thursfield	2012-11-23	1	-0/+25
	Although this duplicates the definitions of the systems, it is misleading to build a system named x86_64 for 32-bit x86, and we have a real instance of a user expecting the x86_32 system morphs to exist and becoming confused that they don't.