This chapter gives you a brief overview about the SWIG implementation of the C++11 standard. This part of SWIG is still a work in progress.
SWIG supports the new C++ syntax changes with some minor limitations in some areas such as decltype expressions and variadic templates. Wrappers for the new STL types (unordered_ containers, result_of, tuples) are incomplete. The wrappers for the new containers would work much like the C++03 containers and users are welcome to help by adapting the existing container interface files and submitting them as a patch for inclusion in future versions of SWIG.
SWIG correctly parses the rvalue reference syntax '&&', for example the typical usage of it in the move constructor and move assignment operator below:
class MyClass {
...
std::vector<int> numbers;
public:
MyClass() : numbers() {}
MyClass(MyClass &&other) : numbers(std::move(other.numbers)) {}
MyClass & operator=(MyClass &&other) {
numbers = std::move(other.numbers);
return *this;
}
};
Rvalue references are designed for C++ temporaries and are not particularly useful when used from non-C++ target languages. One option is to just ignore them via %ignore. For example, ignore the move constructor:
%ignore MyClass::MyClass(MyClass &&);
Rvalue reference parameters are useful as input parameters in C++ for implementing move semantics, such as, in the move constructor and move assignment operator. This type of usage can be useful from target languages too to avoid copying large objects.
If you do wrap a function/contructor with an rvalue reference parameter and pass a proxy class to it, SWIG will assume that after the call, the rvalue reference parameter object will have been 'moved'. The proxy class passed as the rvalue reference, will own the underlying C++ object up until it is used as an rvalue reference parameter. Afterwards, the proxy class will have the underlying C++ pointer set to the nullptr so that the proxy class instance cannot be used again and the underlying (moved from) C++ object will be deleted after the function/constructor call has returned.
In this way, the SWIG proxy class works much like an exclusively owned smart pointer (think of std::unique_ptr), passing ownership to the called C++ function/constructor. Let's consider an example in Java using the wrapped proxy class from above:
MyClass mc = new MyClass(); MyClass mc1 = new MyClass(mc); // move constructor MyClass mc2 = new MyClass(mc); // move constructor fails
The second call to the move constructor will fail as the mc proxy instance has been moved. Each target language handles the moved proxy class slightly differently when attempting to move it again, but typically you'll get an exception such as in Java:
Exception in thread "main" java.lang.RuntimeException: Cannot release ownership as memory is not owned
at MyClass.swigRelease(MyClass.java:27)
at MyClass.<init>(MyClass.java:55)
at runme.main(runme.java:18)
Note that both normal copy assignment operators as well as move assignment operators are ignored by default in the target languages with the following warning:
example.i:18: Warning 503: Can't wrap 'operator =' unless renamed to a valid identifier.
Using a %rename will remove the warning and also makes the move assignment operator available from the target language:
%rename(MoveAssign) MyClass::operator=(MyClass &&);
You can then use it, but like the move constructor example above, you cannot use a proxy class once it has already been moved:
MyClass mc = new MyClass(); MyClass mc2 = mc.MoveAssign(mc); MyClass mc3 = mc.MoveAssign(mc); // Use of mc again will fail
It is of course perfectly possible in C++ for a function/constructor to not move an object passed to it in an rvalue reference parameter. The assumption that SWIG makes would then not hold and customisation of the appropriate input typemaps would be required. For scripting languages, this would be for the 'in' typemap and for the non-scripting languages additional typemaps such as the 'javain' typemap, which is used to set the memory ownership of the underlying C++ object for Java, would also need copying and modifying appropriately.
Compatibility note: SWIG-4.1.0 changed the way that rvalue reference parameters were handled and implemented typemaps assuming that the proxy class owns the underlying C++ object and transfers ownership of the object when a function/constructor with an rvalue reference parameter is called.
While rvalue reference parameter inputs are not uncommon in C++ and can be usefully utilised from target languages, this cannot be said for rvalue reference outputs. Firstly, it is quite unusual in C++ to have functions that return an rvalue reference. Secondly, these cases are nigh on impossible to use from a target language. The main problem is these references are for C++ compiler temporaries used on the stack and the target languages use objects on the heap and the concept of compiler temporary objects doesn't make sense from another language.
Using MyClass from earlier and this C++ code:
void use(MyClass &&mc); MyClass && get1(); MyClass & get2();
SWIG wraps the get1 and get2 functions more or less identically. The returned references are converted into pointers that are not owned by the target language. It means that the following perfectly valid C++ has no equivalent in any of the target languages:
use(get1()); use(std::move(get2()));
An attempt to call the equivalent use(get1()) from one of the target languages will result in the ownership failure mentioned in the previous section as the object being passed to the use function is not owned by the proxy class. In order to own the object, it would need to be cloned for the object to move from the stack to the heap, for which an appropriate clone function would be required, but may not even be available. Note that a move constructor or copy constructor may slice the object when inheritance is involved. Alternatively, customising the input rvalue reference typemap, as mentioned in the previous section, could remove the ownership requirement. Another alternative would be to modify the output rvalue reference typemap to always clone the rvalue reference object. Fortunately you're highly unlikely to have to solve any of these issues!
SWIG has traditionally relied on wrapped C++ types to be copy constructible or copy assignable, either via an explicit or implicit copy constructor and copy assignment operator. Prior to C++11, a function could not return nor take a type by value that was not copyable. In C++11 this is no longer the case. A type can also be movable if it has has a move constructor and a move assignment operator. A move-only type is movable but not copyable; it has both the copy constructor and copy assignment operator deleted. Movable types can appear in function signatures for passing 'by value' and in C++11 the object can then be moved rather than copied.
SWIG has support for both copyable and/or movable types. Support for move semantics is quite seamless when returning by value from a function. Support for move semantics is less so and may require some customisation when passing by value to a function. First let's consider returning by value from a function.
The support for function return values is generically implemented in the "out" SWIGTYPE typemap which supports any type, including copyable, movable and move-only types. The typemap code is very simple and written so that the compiler will call the move constructor if possible, otherwise the copy constructor:
%typemap(out) SWIGTYPE %{
$result = new $1_ltype($1);
%}
The above typemap is for C# and when used to wrap a move-only type such as:
struct MoveOnly {
int val;
MoveOnly(): val(0) {}
MoveOnly(const MoveOnly &) = delete;
MoveOnly(MoveOnly &&) = default;
MoveOnly & operator=(const MoveOnly &) = delete;
MoveOnly & operator=(MoveOnly &&) = default;
static MoveOnly create() { return MoveOnly(); }
static void take(MoveOnly mo);
};
will generate wrapper code for the create factory method:
SWIGEXPORT void * SWIGSTDCALL CSharp_MoveOnly_create() {
void * jresult ;
SwigValueWrapper< MoveOnly > result;
result = MoveOnly::create();
jresult = new MoveOnly(result);
return jresult;
}
SwigValueWrapper is covered in Pass and return by value. Note that the generated code could be optimised further using the "optimal" attribute in the "out" typemap, so if the above typemap is customised as follows (note that this is C# specific):
%typemap(out, optimal="1") MoveOnly %{
$result = new $1_ltype($1);
%}
then the generated code will result in the object being optimally moved:
SWIGEXPORT void * SWIGSTDCALL CSharp_MoveOnly_create() {
void * jresult ;
jresult = new MoveOnly(MoveOnly::create());
return jresult;
}
Now let's consider passing by value. We'll consider three cases; namely types that are:
and for clarification, define these two additional types as follows:
struct CopyOnly {
int val;
CopyOnly(): val(0) {}
CopyOnly(const CopyOnly &) = default;
CopyOnly & operator=(const CopyOnly &) = default;
static CopyOnly create() { return CopyOnly(); }
static void take(CopyOnly co);
};
struct MovableCopyable {
int val;
MovableCopyable(): val(0) {}
MovableCopyable(const MovableCopyable &) = default;
MovableCopyable(MovableCopyable &&) = default;
MovableCopyable & operator=(const MovableCopyable &) = default;
MovableCopyable & operator=(MovableCopyable &&) = default;
static MovableCopyable create() { return MovableCopyable(); }
static void take(MovableCopyable mc);
};
The generated code is shown below for CopyOnly::take (with additional comments for when constructors and assignment operators are called). While the code shown is C# specific, the generated constructor and/or assignment operator calls are ultimately the same for all target languages.
SWIGEXPORT void SWIGSTDCALL CSharp_CopyOnly_take(void * jarg1) {
CopyOnly arg1 ; // (a) Default constructor
CopyOnly *argp1 ;
argp1 = (CopyOnly *)jarg1;
if (!argp1) {
SWIG_CSharpSetPendingExceptionArgument(SWIG_CSharpArgumentNullException, "Attempt to dereference null CopyOnly", 0);
return ;
}
arg1 = *argp1; // (b) Copy assignment
CopyOnly::take(SWIG_STD_MOVE(arg1)); // (c) Copy constructor
}
Note that SWIG_STD_MOVE is a macro defined as shown below to use std::move which is only available from C++11 onwards:
#if __cplusplus >=201103L # define SWIG_STD_MOVE(OBJ) std::move(OBJ) #else # define SWIG_STD_MOVE(OBJ) OBJ #endif
Also note: (c) Copy constructor. Yes, when passing by value the copy constructor is called for all versions of C++, even C++11 and later even though std::move is specified. It's a C++ language feature for types that don't have move semantics!
The generated code for MovableCopyable::take is the same as for CopyOnly::take, however, the C++ compiler will choose the move constructor this time where commented (c) Move constructor:
SWIGEXPORT void SWIGSTDCALL CSharp_MovableCopyable_take(void * jarg1) {
MovableCopyable arg1 ; // (a) Default constructor
MovableCopyable *argp1 ;
argp1 = (MovableCopyable *)jarg1;
if (!argp1) {
SWIG_CSharpSetPendingExceptionArgument(SWIG_CSharpArgumentNullException, "Attempt to dereference null MovableCopyable", 0);
return ;
}
arg1 = *argp1; // (b) Copy assignment
MovableCopyable::take(SWIG_STD_MOVE(arg1)); // (c) Move constructor
}
There are two optimisation opportunities available.
Simply add the following before the MovableCopyable::take method is parsed:
%valuewrapper MovableCopyable;
%include <swigmove.i>
%apply SWIGTYPE MOVE { MovableCopyable }
will result in this optimal code where just one move constructor is invoked:
SWIGEXPORT void SWIGSTDCALL CSharp_MovableCopyable_take(void * jarg1) {
SwigValueWrapper< MovableCopyable > arg1 ; // (a) No constructors invoked
MovableCopyable *argp1 ;
argp1 = (MovableCopyable *)jarg1;
if (!argp1) {
SWIG_CSharpSetPendingExceptionArgument(SWIG_CSharpArgumentNullException, "Attempt to dereference null MovableCopyable", 0);
return ;
}
SwigValueWrapper< MovableCopyable >::reset(arg1, argp1); // (b) No constructor or assignment operator invoked
MovableCopyable::take(SWIG_STD_MOVE(arg1)); // (c) Move constructor
}
Note that SwigValueWrapper will call the destructor for the pointer passed to it in the reset function. This pointer is the underlying C++ object that the proxy class owns. The details aren't shown, but the 'csin' typemap also generates C# code to ensure that the proxy class releases ownership of the object. Please see the 'SWIGTYPE MOVE' typemaps in the swigmove.i file provided for each target language. Therefore full move semantics are implemented; ownership is moved from the proxy class into the C++ layer and the net effect is the same as using an rvalue reference parameter discussed earlier.
Lastly, let's consider the MoveOnly::take function defined earlier. By default the generated code fails to compile as MoveOnly does not have a copy assignment operator. SWIG is not designed to select a different typemap automatically for move-only types and the user must apply the SWIGTYPE MOVE typemaps to ensure that only move-only semantics are used. However, SWIG is able to automatically use %feature("valuewrapper") for move-only types so it is not necessary to explicitly use this feature. So in this move-only case, simply add the following before MoveOnly::take is parsed, which results in the same optimal code shown above for MovableCopyable:
%include <swigmove.i>
%apply SWIGTYPE MOVE { MoveOnly }
Compatibility note: SWIG-4.1.0 introduced support for taking advantage of types with move semantics and making it possible to easily use move only types.
SWIG parses and identifies the keyword constexpr, but cannot fully utilise it. These C++ compile time constants are usable as runtime constants from the target languages. Below shows example usage for assigning a C++ compile time constant from a compile time constant function:
constexpr int XXX() { return 10; }
constexpr int YYY = XXX() + 100;
When either of these is used from a target language, a runtime call is made to obtain the underlying constant.
SWIG correctly parses extern template explicit instantiation declarations. However, this template instantiation suppression in a translation unit has no relevance outside of the C++ compiler and so is not used by SWIG. SWIG only uses %template for instantiating and wrapping templates. Consider the class template below:
// Class template template class std::vector<int>; // C++03 template explicit instantiation definition in C++ extern template class std::vector<int>; // C++11 template explicit instantiation declaration (extern template) %template(VectorInt) std::vector<int>; // SWIG template instantiation
The above result in warnings:
example.i:2: Warning 320: Explicit template instantiation ignored. example.i:3: Warning 327: Extern template ignored.
Similarly for the function template below:
// Function template template void Func<int>(); // C++03 template explicit instantiation definition in C++ extern template void Func<int>(); // C++11 template explicit instantiation declaration (extern template) %template(FuncInt) Func<int>; // SWIG template instantiation
Initializer lists are very much a C++ compiler construct and are not very accessible from wrappers as they are intended for compile time initialization of classes using the special std::initializer_list type. SWIG detects usage of initializer lists and will emit a special informative warning each time one is used:
example.i:33: Warning 476: Initialization using std::initializer_list.
Initializer lists usually appear in constructors but can appear in any function or method. They often appear in constructors which are overloaded with alternative approaches to initializing a class, such as the std container's push_back method for adding elements to a container. The recommended approach then is to simply ignore the initializer-list constructor, for example:
%ignore Container::Container(std::initializer_list<int>);
class Container {
public:
Container(std::initializer_list<int>); // initializer-list constructor
Container();
void push_back(const int &);
...
};
Alternatively you could modify the class and add another constructor for initialization by some other means, for example by a std::vector:
%include <std_vector.i>
class Container {
public:
Container(const std::vector<int> &);
Container(std::initializer_list<int>); // initializer-list constructor
Container();
void push_back(const int &);
...
};
And then call this constructor from your target language, for example, in Python, the following will call the constructor taking the std::vector:
>>> c = Container( [1, 2, 3, 4] )
If you are unable to modify the class being wrapped, consider ignoring the initializer-list constructor and using %extend to add in an alternative constructor:
%include <std_vector.i>
%extend Container {
Container(const std::vector<int> &elements) {
Container *c = new Container();
for (int element : elements)
c->push_back(element);
return c;
}
}
%ignore Container::Container(std::initializer_list<int>);
class Container {
public:
Container(std::initializer_list<int>); // initializer-list constructor
Container();
void push_back(const int &);
...
};
The above makes the wrappers look is as if the class had been declared as follows:
%include <std_vector.i>
class Container {
public:
Container(const std::vector<int> &);
// Container(std::initializer_list<int>); // initializer-list constructor (ignored)
Container();
void push_back(const int &);
...
};
std::initializer_list is simply a container that can only be initialized at compile time. As it is just a C++ type, it is possible to write typemaps for a target language container to map onto std::initializer_list. However, this can only be done for a fixed number of elements as initializer lists are not designed to be constructed with a variable number of arguments at runtime. The example below is a very simple approach which ignores any parameters passed in and merely initializes with a fixed list of fixed integer values chosen at compile time:
%typemap(in) std::initializer_list<int> {
$1 = {10, 20, 30, 40, 50};
}
class Container {
public:
Container(std::initializer_list<int>); // initializer-list constructor
Container();
void push_back(const int &);
...
};
Any attempt at passing in values from the target language will be ignored and be replaced by {10, 20, 30, 40, 50}. Needless to say, this approach is very limited, but could be improved upon, but only slightly. A typemap could be written to map a fixed number of elements on to the std::initializer_list, but with values decided at runtime. The typemaps would be target language specific.
Note that the default typemap for std::initializer_list does nothing but issue the warning and hence any user supplied typemaps will override it and suppress the warning.
The curly brackets {} for member initialization are fully supported by SWIG:
struct BasicStruct {
int x;
double y;
};
struct AltStruct {
AltStruct(int x, double y) : x_{x}, y_{y} {}
int x_;
double y_;
};
BasicStruct var1{5, 3.2}; // only fills the struct components
AltStruct var2{2, 4.3}; // calls the constructor
Uniform initialization does not affect usage from the target language, for example in Python:
>>> a = AltStruct(10, 142.15) >>> a.x_ 10 >>> a.y_ 142.15
SWIG supports decltype() with limitations. Single variables are allowed, however, non-trivial expressions are not supported very well. For example, the following code will work:
int i; decltype(i) j;
SWIG is able to deduce that the variable, i, is type int.
Using a non-trivial expression for the decltype results in a warning:
int i; int j; decltype(i+j) k; // Warning 344: Unable to deduce decltype for 'i+j'.
This warning should be viewed as a prompt to add in a manual ignore of the variable/function as in most cases the generated code will not compile. For the example above, ignore the symbol that uses decltype and perhaps additionally suppress the warning as follows:
#pragma SWIG nowarn=SWIGWARN_CPP11_DECLTYPE %ignore k;
If an ignore is not acceptable, a workaround is to redefine the symbol with the actual type, for example:
int k; // define k with the actual type %ignore k; // ignore the real definition of k int i; int j; decltype(i+j) k; // Warning 344: Unable to deduce decltype for 'i+j'.
SWIG does not support auto as a type specifier for variables, only for specifying the return type of lambdas and functions.
This feature is part of the implementation block only. SWIG ignores it.
SWIG correctly parses most of the Lambda functions syntax. For example:
auto val = [] { return something; };
auto sum = [](int x, int y) { return x+y; };
auto sum = [](int x, int y) -> int { return x+y; };
The lambda functions are removed from the wrappers for now, because of the lack of support for closures (scope of the lambda functions) in the target languages.
Lambda functions used to create variables can also be parsed, but due to limited support of auto when the type is deduced from the expression, the variables are simply ignored.
auto six = [](int x, int y) { return x+y; }(4, 2);
Better support should be available in a later release.
SWIG fully supports the new definition of functions. For example:
struct SomeStruct {
int FuncName(int x, int y);
};
can now be written as in C++11:
struct SomeStruct {
auto FuncName(int x, int y) -> int;
};
auto SomeStruct::FuncName(int x, int y) -> int {
return x + y;
}
The usage in the target languages remains the same, for example in Python:
>>> a = SomeStruct() >>> a.FuncName(10, 5) 15
SWIG will also deal with type inference for the return type, as per the limitations described earlier. For example:
auto square(float a, float b) -> decltype(a);
There are three parts to object construction improvement. The first improvement is constructor delegation such as the following:
class A {
public:
int a;
int b;
int c;
A() : A(10) {}
A(int aa) : A(aa, 20) {}
A(int aa, int bb) : A(aa, bb, 30) {}
A(int aa, int bb, int cc) { a=aa; b=bb; c=cc; }
};
where peer constructors can be called. SWIG handles this without any issue.
The second improvement is constructor inheritance via a using declaration. This is parsed correctly, but the additional constructors are not currently added to the derived proxy class in the target language. An example is shown below:
class BaseClass {
public:
BaseClass(int iValue);
};
class DerivedClass: public BaseClass {
public:
using BaseClass::BaseClass; // Adds DerivedClass(int) constructor
};
The final part is member initialization at the site of the declaration. This kind of initialization is handled by SWIG.
class SomeClass {
public:
SomeClass() {}
explicit SomeClass(int new_value) : value(new_value) {}
int value = 5;
};
The special identifiers final and override can be used on methods and destructors, such as in the following example:
struct BaseStruct {
virtual void ab() const = 0;
virtual void cd();
virtual void ef();
virtual ~BaseStruct();
};
struct DerivedStruct : BaseStruct {
virtual void ab() const override;
virtual void cd() final;
virtual void ef() final override;
virtual ~DerivedStruct() override;
};
Classes can also be marked as final, such as
struct FinalDerivedStruct final : BaseStruct {
virtual void ab() const override;
};
Compatibility note: Final methods were supported much earlier than final classes. SWIG-4.1.0 was the first version to support classes marked as final.
The nullptr constant is mostly unimportant in wrappers. In the few places it has an effect, it is treated like NULL.
SWIG supports strongly typed enumerations and parses the new enum class syntax and forward declarator for the enums, such as:
enum class MyEnum : unsigned int;
Strongly typed enums are often used to avoid name clashes such as the following:
struct Color {
enum class RainbowColors : unsigned int {
Red, Orange, Yellow, Green, Blue, Indigo, Violet
};
enum class WarmColors {
Yellow, Orange, Red
};
// Note normal enum
enum PrimeColors {
Red=100, Green, Blue
};
};
There are various ways that the target languages handle enums, so it is not possible to precisely state how they are handled in this section. However, generally, most scripting languages mangle in the strongly typed enumeration's class name, but do not use any additional mangling for normal enumerations. For example, in Python, the following code
print Color.RainbowColors_Red, Color.WarmColors_Red, Color.Red
results in
0 2 100
The strongly typed languages often wrap normal enums into an enum class and so treat normal enums and strongly typed enums the same. The equivalent in Java is:
System.out.println(Color.RainbowColors.Red.swigValue() + " " + Color.WarmColors.Red.swigValue() + " " + Color.PrimeColors.Red.swigValue());
SWIG correctly parses the symbols >> as closing the template block, if found inside it at the top level, or as the right shift operator >> otherwise.
std::vector<std::vector<int>> myIntTable;
SWIG correctly parses the keyword explicit for operators in addition to constructors now. For example:
class U {
public:
int u;
};
class V {
public:
int v;
};
class TestClass {
public:
//implicit converting constructor
TestClass(U const &val) { t=val.u; }
// explicit constructor
explicit TestClass(V const &val) { t=val.v; }
int t;
};
struct Testable {
// explicit conversion operator
explicit operator bool() const {
return false;
}
};
The effect of explicit constructors and operators has little relevance for the proxy classes as target languages don't have the same concepts of implicit conversions as C++. Conversion operators either with or without explicit need renaming to a valid identifier name in order to make them available as a normal proxy method.
A type alias is a statement of the form:
using PFD = void (*)(double); // New introduced syntax
which is equivalent to the old style typedef:
typedef void (*PFD)(double); // The old style
The following is an example of an alias template:
template< typename T1, typename T2, int N >
class SomeType {
public:
T1 a;
T2 b;
};
template< typename T2 >
using TypedefName = SomeType<char*, T2, 5>;
SWIG supports both type aliasing and alias templates. However, in order to use an alias template, two %template directives must be used:
%template(SomeTypeBool) SomeType<char*, bool, 5>; %template() TypedefName<bool>;
Firstly, the actual template is instantiated with a name to be used by the target language, as per any template being wrapped. Secondly, the empty template instantiation, %template(), is required for the alias template. This second requirement is necessary to add the appropriate instantiated template type into the type system as SWIG does not automatically instantiate templates. See the Templates section for more general information on wrapping templates.
SWIG fully supports any type inside a union even if it does not define a trivial constructor. For example, the wrapper for the following code correctly provides access to all members in the union:
struct point {
point() {}
point(int x, int y) : x_(x), y_(y) {}
int x_, y_;
};
#include <new> // For placement 'new' in the constructor below
union P {
int z;
double w;
point p; // Illegal in C++03; legal in C++11.
// Due to the point member, a constructor definition is required.
P() {
new(&p) point();
}
} p1;
SWIG supports the variadic templates including the <> variadic class inheritance, variadic methods, variadic constructors and initializers. Example:
template <typename... BaseClasses> class ClassName : public BaseClasses... {
public:
ClassName(BaseClasses &&... baseClasses) : BaseClasses(baseClasses)... {}
void InstanceMethod(const BaseClasses&... baseClasses) {}
};
The %template directive works as expected for variable template parameters.
struct A {
virtual void amethod();
virtual ~A();
};
struct B {
virtual void bmethod();
virtual ~B();
};
%template(ClassName0) ClassName<>
%template(ClassName1) ClassName<A>
%template(ClassName2) ClassName<A, B>
Example usage from say Python:
cn0 = ClassName0() cn0.InstanceMethod() a = A() cn1 = ClassName1(a) cn1.amethod() cn1.InstanceMethod(a) b = B() cn2 = ClassName2(a, b) cn2.InstanceMethod(a, b) cn2.amethod() cn2.bmethod()
Support for the variadic sizeof() function also works:
const int SIZE = sizeof...(ClassName<A, B>);
In the above example SIZE is of course wrapped as a constant.
Compatibility note: SWIG-4.2.0 was the first version to fully support variadic templates. SWIG-3.0.0 provided initial support and was limited to only one variadic parameter.
C++11 adds support for UCS-2 and UCS-4 character literals. These character literals are preceded by either 'u' or 'U'.
char16_t a = u'a'; char32_t b = U'b';
Compatibility note: SWIG-4.0.0 was the first version to support these Universal Coded Character Set (UCS) character literals.
SWIG supports wide string and Unicode string constants and raw string literals.
// New string literals wstring aa = L"Wide string"; const char *bb = u8"UTF-8 string"; const char16_t *cc = u"UTF-16 string"; const char32_t *dd = U"UTF-32 string"; // Raw string literals const char *xx = ")I'm an \"ascii\" \\ string."; const char *ee = R"XXX()I'm an "ascii" \ string.)XXX"; // same as xx wstring ff = LR"XXX(I'm a "raw wide" \ string.)XXX"; const char *gg = u8R"XXX(I'm a "raw UTF-8" \ string.)XXX"; const char16_t *hh = uR"XXX(I'm a "raw UTF-16" \ string.)XXX"; const char32_t *ii = UR"XXX(I'm a "raw UTF-32" \ string.)XXX";
Non-ASCII string support varies quite a bit among the various target languages though.
Note: There is a bug currently where SWIG's preprocessor incorrectly parses an odd number of double quotes inside raw string literals.
SWIG parses the declaration of user-defined literals, that is, the operator "" _mysuffix() function syntax.
Some examples are the raw literal:
OutputType operator "" _myRawLiteral(const char * value);
numeric cooked literals:
OutputType operator "" _mySuffixIntegral(unsigned long long); OutputType operator "" _mySuffixFloat(long double);
and cooked string literals:
OutputType operator "" _mySuffix(const char * string_values, size_t num_chars); OutputType operator "" _mySuffix(const wchar_t * string_values, size_t num_chars); OutputType operator "" _mySuffix(const char16_t * string_values, size_t num_chars); OutputType operator "" _mySuffix(const char32_t * string_values, size_t num_chars);
Like other operators that SWIG parses, a warning is given about renaming the operator in order for it to be wrapped:
example.i:27: Warning 503: Can't wrap 'operator "" _myRawLiteral' unless renamed to a valid identifier.
If %rename is used, then it can be called like any other wrapped method. Currently you need to specify the full declaration including parameters for %rename:
%rename(MyRawLiteral) operator"" _myRawLiteral(const char * value);
Or if you just wish to ignore it altogether:
%ignore operator "" _myRawLiteral(const char * value);
Note that use of user-defined literals such as the following still give a syntax error:
OutputType var1 = "1234"_suffix; OutputType var2 = 1234_suffix; OutputType var3 = 3.1416_suffix;
SWIG correctly parses the thread_local keyword. For example, variables reachable by the current thread can be defined as:
struct A {
static thread_local int val;
};
thread_local int global_val;
The use of the thread_local storage specifier does not affect the wrapping process; it does not modify the wrapper code compared to when it is not specified. A variable will be thread local if accessed from different threads from the target language in the same way that it will be thread local if accessed from C++ code.
SWIG handles explicitly defaulted functions, that is, = default added to a function declaration. Deleted definitions, which are also called deleted functions, have = delete added to the function declaration. For example:
struct NonCopyable {
NonCopyable & operator=(const NonCopyable &) = delete; /* Removes operator= */
NonCopyable(const NonCopyable &) = delete; /* Removes copy constructor */
NonCopyable() = default; /* Explicitly allows the empty constructor */
};
Wrappers for deleted functions will not be available in the target language. Wrappers for defaulted functions will of course be available in the target language. Explicitly defaulted functions have no direct effect for SWIG wrapping as the declaration is handled much like any other method declaration parsed by SWIG.
Deleted functions are also designed to prevent implicit conversions when calling the function. For example, the C++ compiler will not compile any code which attempts to use an int as the type of the parameter passed to f below:
struct NoInt {
void f(double i);
void f(int) = delete;
};
This is a C++ compile time check and SWIG does not make any attempt to detect if the target language is using an int instead of a double though, so in this case it is entirely possible to pass an int instead of a double to f from Java, Python etc.
SWIG correctly parses and uses the new long long type already introduced in C99 some time ago.
SWIG correctly parses the new static_assert declarations (though 3.0.12 and earlier had a bug which meant this wasn't accepted at file scope). This is a C++ compile time directive so there isn't anything useful that SWIG can do with it.
template <typename T>
struct Check {
static_assert(sizeof(int) <= sizeof(T), "not big enough");
};
SWIG can parse the new sizeof() on types as well as on objects. For example:
struct A {
int member;
};
const int SIZE = sizeof(A::member); // does not work with C++03. Okay with C++11
In Python:
>>> SIZE 8
C++11 added in the noexcept specification to exception specifications to indicate that a function simply may or may not throw an exception, without actually naming any exception. SWIG understands these, although there isn't any useful way that this information can be taken advantage of by target languages, so it is as good as ignored during the wrapping process. Below are some examples of noexcept in function declarations:
static void noex1() noexcept; int noex2(int) noexcept(true); int noex3(int, bool) noexcept(false);
An alignof operator is used mostly within C++ to return alignment in number of bytes, but could be used to initialize a variable as shown below. The variable's value will be available for access by the target language as any other variable's compile time initialised value.
const int align1 = alignof(A::member);
The alignas specifier for variable alignment is not yet supported. Example usage:
struct alignas(16) S {
int num;
};
alignas(double) unsigned char c[sizeof(double)];
Use the preprocessor to work around this for now:
#define alignas(T)
Attributes such as those shown below, are supported since SWIG 4.1.0 but are currently crudely ignored by the parser's tokeniser so they have no effect on SWIG's code generation.
int [[attr1]] i [[attr2, attr3]]; [[noreturn, nothrow]] void f [[noreturn]] ();
C++11 non-static member functions can be declared with ref-qualifiers. Member functions declared with a & lvalue ref-qualifiers are wrapped like any other function without ref-qualifiers. Member functions declared with a && rvalue ref-qualifiers are ignored by default as they are unlikely to be required from non-C++ languages where the concept of rvalue-ness for the implied *this pointer does not apply. The warning is hidden by default, but can be displayed as described in the section on Enabling extra warnings.
Consider:
struct RQ {
void m1(int x) &;
void m2(int x) &&;
};
The only wrapped method will be the lvalue ref-qualified method m1 and if SWIG is run with the -Wextra command-line option, the following warning will be issued indicating m2 is not wrapped:
example.i:7: Warning 405: Method with rvalue ref-qualifier m2(int) && ignored.
If you unignore the method as follows, wrappers for m2 will be generated:
%feature("ignore", "0") RQ::m2(int x) &&;
struct RQ {
void m1(int x) &;
void m2(int x) &&;
};
Inspection of the generated C++ code, will show that std::move is used on the instance of the RQ * class:
RQ *arg1 = (RQ *) 0 ; int arg2 ; arg1 = ...marshalled from target language... arg2 = ...marshalled from target language... std::move(*arg1).m2(arg2);
This will compile but when run, the move effects may not be what you want. As stated earlier, rvalue ref-qualifiers aren't really applicable outside the world of C++. However, if you really know what you are doing, full control over the call to the method is possible via the low-level "action" feature. This feature completely replaces the call to the underlying function, that is, the last line in the snippet of code above.
%feature("ignore", "0") RQ::m2(int x) &&;
%feature("action") RQ::m2(int x) && %{
RQ().m2(arg2);
%}
struct RQ {
void m1(int x) &;
void m2(int x) &&;
};
resulting in:
RQ *arg1 = (RQ *) 0 ; int arg2 ; arg1 = ...marshalled from target language... arg2 = ...marshalled from target language... RQ().m2(arg2);
Compatibility note: SWIG-4.0.0 was the first version to support ref-qualifiers.
SWIG does not currently wrap or use any of the new threading classes introduced (thread, mutex, locks, condition variables, task). The main reason is that SWIG target languages offer their own threading facilities so there is limited use for them.
SWIG does not provide library files for the new tuple types yet. Variadic template support requires further work to provide substantial tuple wrappers.
The new hash tables in the STL are unordered_set, unordered_multiset, unordered_map, unordered_multimap. These are not available in all target languages. Any missing support can in principle be easily implemented by adapting the current STL containers.
While SWIG could provide wrappers for the new C++11 regular expressions classes, there is little need as the target languages have their own regular expression facilities.
SWIG provides special smart pointer handling for std::shared_ptr in the same way it has support for boost::shared_ptr. Please see the shared_ptr smart pointer and unique_ptr smart pointer library sections. There is no special smart pointer handling available for std::weak_ptr.
This feature extends and standardizes the standard library only and does not effect the C++ language nor SWIG.
Wrapper references are similar to normal C++ references but are copy-constructible and copy-assignable. They could conceivably be used in public APIs. There is no special support for std::reference_wrapper in SWIG though. Users would need to write their own typemaps if wrapper references are being used and these would be similar to the plain C++ reference typemaps.
SWIG supports functor classes in a few languages in a very natural way. However nothing is provided yet for the new std::function template. SWIG will parse usage of the template like any other template.
%rename(__call__) Test::operator(); // Default renaming used for Python
struct Test {
bool operator()(int x, int y); // function object
};
#include <functional>
std::function<void (int, int)> pF = Test; // function template wrapper
Example of supported usage of the plain functor from Python is shown below. It does not involve std::function.
t = Test() b = t(1, 2) # invoke C++ function object
The type_traits functions to support C++ metaprogramming is useful at compile time and is aimed specifically at C++ development:
#include <type_traits>
// First way of operating.
template< bool B > struct algorithm {
template< class T1, class T2 > static int do_it(T1 &, T2 &) { /*...*/ return 1; }
};
// Second way of operating.
template<> struct algorithm<true> {
template< class T1, class T2 > static int do_it(T1, T2) { /*...*/ return 2; }
};
// Instantiating 'elaborate' will automatically instantiate the correct way to operate, depending on the types used.
template< class T1, class T2 > int elaborate(T1 A, T2 B) {
// Use the second way only if 'T1' is an integer and if 'T2' is a floating point,
// otherwise use the first way.
return algorithm< std::is_integral<T1>::value && std::is_floating_point<T2>::value >::do_it(A, B);
}
SWIG correctly parses the template specialization, template types etc. However, metaprogramming and the additional support in the type_traits header is really for compile time and is not much use at runtime for the target languages. For example, as SWIG requires explicit instantiation of templates via %template, there isn't much that std::is_integral<int> is going to provide by itself. However, template functions using such metaprogramming techniques might be useful to wrap. For example, the following instantiations could be made:
%template(Elaborate) elaborate<int, int>; %template(Elaborate) elaborate<int, double>;
Then the appropriate algorithm can be called for the subset of types given by the above %template instantiations from a target language, such as Python:
>>> Elaborate(0, 0) 1 >>> Elaborate(0, 0.0) 2
The new std::result_of class introduced in the <functional> header provides a generic way to obtain the return type of a function type via std::result_of::type. There isn't any library interface file to support this type. With a bit of work, SWIG will deduce the return type of functions when used in std::result_of using the approach shown below. The technique basically forward declares the std::result_of template class, then partially specializes it for the function types of interest. SWIG will use the partial specialization and hence correctly use the std::result_of::type provided in the partial specialization.
%inline %{
#include <functional>
typedef double(*fn_ptr)(double);
%}
namespace std {
// Forward declaration of result_of
template<typename Func> struct result_of;
// Add in a partial specialization of result_of
template<> struct result_of< fn_ptr(double) > {
typedef double type;
};
}
%template() std::result_of< fn_ptr(double) >;
%inline %{
double square(double x) {
return (x * x);
}
template<class Fun, class Arg>
typename std::result_of<Fun(Arg)>::type test_result_impl(Fun fun, Arg arg) {
return fun(arg);
}
%}
%template(test_result) test_result_impl< fn_ptr, double >;
%constant double (*SQUARE)(double) = square;
Note the first use of %template which SWIG requires to instantiate the template. The empty template instantiation suffices as no proxy class is required for std::result_of<Fun(Arg)>::type as this type is really just a double. The second %template instantiates the template function which is being wrapped for use as a callback. The %constant can then be used for any callback function as described in Pointers to functions and callbacks.
Example usage from Python should give the not too surprising result:
>>> test_result(SQUARE, 5.0) 25.0
Phew, that is a lot of hard work to get a callback working. You could just go with the more attractive option of just using double as the return type in the function declaration instead of result_of!