<feed xmlns='http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom'>
<title>delta/python-packages/zope-security.git/docs/proxy.rst, branch update</title>
<subtitle>github.com: zopefoundation/zope.security.git
</subtitle>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://git.baserock.org/cgit/delta/python-packages/zope-security.git/'/>
<entry>
<title>Remove misleading comment</title>
<updated>2018-08-08T15:18:14+00:00</updated>
<author>
<name>Marius Gedminas</name>
<email>marius@gedmin.as</email>
</author>
<published>2018-08-08T15:18:14+00:00</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://git.baserock.org/cgit/delta/python-packages/zope-security.git/commit/?id=c489eb98a1aa9ba31a067d55eb79bea144229e8b'/>
<id>c489eb98a1aa9ba31a067d55eb79bea144229e8b</id>
<content type='text'>
ABCMeta._abc_invalidation_counter is still present on Python 3.7 when
the pure-python _py_abc implementation is used (as opposed to the
builtin _abc).
</content>
<content type='xhtml'>
<div xmlns='http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml'>
<pre>
ABCMeta._abc_invalidation_counter is still present on Python 3.7 when
the pure-python _py_abc implementation is used (as opposed to the
builtin _abc).
</pre>
</div>
</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Fix test failure on Python 3.7</title>
<updated>2018-08-08T15:15:01+00:00</updated>
<author>
<name>Marius Gedminas</name>
<email>marius@gedmin.as</email>
</author>
<published>2018-08-08T15:15:01+00:00</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://git.baserock.org/cgit/delta/python-packages/zope-security.git/commit/?id=9f9b4106a10557dcdd621a67be7cb90e5d17e98f'/>
<id>9f9b4106a10557dcdd621a67be7cb90e5d17e98f</id>
<content type='text'>
ABCMeta._abc_invalidation_counter is no more.

The test passes if we don't touch it, so we're all good?  There are no
more hidden caches we need to worry about?  Anybody want to dig into
this deeper?
</content>
<content type='xhtml'>
<div xmlns='http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml'>
<pre>
ABCMeta._abc_invalidation_counter is no more.

The test passes if we don't touch it, so we're all good?  There are no
more hidden caches we need to worry about?  Anybody want to dig into
this deeper?
</pre>
</div>
</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Expand the proxy issues section on isinstance.</title>
<updated>2017-09-15T12:43:30+00:00</updated>
<author>
<name>Jason Madden</name>
<email>jamadden@gmail.com</email>
</author>
<published>2017-09-15T12:43:30+00:00</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://git.baserock.org/cgit/delta/python-packages/zope-security.git/commit/?id=502c31eea599977b20c43d8659db09f71ed0cff2'/>
<id>502c31eea599977b20c43d8659db09f71ed0cff2</id>
<content type='text'>
</content>
<content type='xhtml'>
<div xmlns='http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml'>
<pre>
</pre>
</div>
</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Document proxy.__class__ troubles with isinstance/issubclass</title>
<updated>2017-09-14T17:17:35+00:00</updated>
<author>
<name>Jason Madden</name>
<email>jamadden@gmail.com</email>
</author>
<published>2017-09-14T17:17:35+00:00</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://git.baserock.org/cgit/delta/python-packages/zope-security.git/commit/?id=8b93f2bb08c45c18f207f61b6691fd13664f8609'/>
<id>8b93f2bb08c45c18f207f61b6691fd13664f8609</id>
<content type='text'>
And suggest workarounds, in a prominent new section about proxy troubles.

Link to this from everywhere we talk about proxies.

Fixes #26
</content>
<content type='xhtml'>
<div xmlns='http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml'>
<pre>
And suggest workarounds, in a prominent new section about proxy troubles.

Link to this from everywhere we talk about proxies.

Fixes #26
</pre>
</div>
</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Split narr.rst into parts and make the example more correct.</title>
<updated>2017-09-14T16:28:31+00:00</updated>
<author>
<name>Jason Madden</name>
<email>jamadden@gmail.com</email>
</author>
<published>2017-09-14T16:28:31+00:00</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://git.baserock.org/cgit/delta/python-packages/zope-security.git/commit/?id=e8818663a59c5c8b146f599ba87666bf1cd7af75'/>
<id>e8818663a59c5c8b146f599ba87666bf1cd7af75</id>
<content type='text'>
It's not doctested so it isn't fully guaranteed to be correct, but it
was relying on conpects that don't exist anymore (simpleinteraction,
and the ISecurityPolicy having the checkPermission() method).
</content>
<content type='xhtml'>
<div xmlns='http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml'>
<pre>
It's not doctested so it isn't fully guaranteed to be correct, but it
was relying on conpects that don't exist anymore (simpleinteraction,
and the ISecurityPolicy having the checkPermission() method).
</pre>
</div>
</content>
</entry>
</feed>
