into more performant executemany() call, similarly to how INSERT
statements can be batched; this will be invoked within flush
to the degree that subsequent UPDATE statements for the
same mapping and table involve the identical columns within the
VALUES clause, as well as that no VALUES-level SQL expressions
are embedded.
- some other inlinings within persistence.py

when we do a get; we return the None as always but we leave the dict blank
and the loader callable still in place.  The case for this implicit get on a pending object is not
super common and there really should be no change in state at all when this
operation proceeds.   This change is more dramatic as it reverses
a behavior SQLA has had since the first release.
fixes #3061

fix that is updated more comprehensively in 1.0 via :ticket:`3061`.
The fix in :ticket:`3060` unfortunately produces a new issue whereby
an eager load of a many-to-one attribute can produce an event
that is interpreted into an attribute change.

of work such that loading for related many-to-one objects is slightly
more aggressive, in the case of a graph of self-referential objects
that are to be deleted; the load of related objects is to help
determine the correct order for deletion if passive_deletes is
not set.
- revert the changes to test_delete_unloaded_m2o, these deletes do in fact
need to occur in the order of the two child objects first.

that might take one of multiple directions; apply this to test_delete_unloaded_m2o
which is now illustrating multiple paths due to #3060/#3061, though still doing the
right thing.

scenario, where an INSERT/DELETE can be turned into an UPDATE.
In this situation, a many-to-one relationship set to None, or
in some cases a scalar attribute set to None, may not be detected
as a net change in value, and therefore the UPDATE would not reset
what was on the previous row.   This is due to some as-yet
unresovled side effects of the way attribute history works in terms
of implicitly assuming None isn't really a "change" for a previously
un-set attribute.  See also :ticket:`3061`. fixes #3060

to True, indicates that a series of DELETE statements should confirm
that the cursor rowcount matches the number of primary keys that should
have matched;  this behavior had been taken off in most cases
(except when version_id is used) to support the unusual edge case of
self-referential ON DELETE CASCADE; to accomodate this, the message
is now just a warning, not an exception, and the flag can be used
to indicate a mapping that expects self-refererntial cascaded
deletes of this nature.  See also :ticket:`2403` for background on the
original change. re: #2403 fix #3007

where one is to be deleted from ON DELETE CASCADE succeeds; the check here makes that fail.
We will need to add an option to enable/disable this check per mapping, will likely
do this in next version