delta/python-packages/numpy.git/numpy/core/src, branch v1.9.2 github.com: numpy/numpy.git Merge pull request #5616 from juliantaylor/backport-1.9.2 2015-03-01T13:33:45+00:00 Julian Taylor juliantaylor108@gmail.com 2015-03-01T13:33:45+00:00 1f68813218223ef2f353678eab3bc154a6a905d6 more backports for 1.9.2 
more backports for 1.9.2
 Merge pull request #5618 from johntyree/arrfill_ulonglong 2015-03-01T01:07:08+00:00 Julian Taylor jtaylor.debian@googlemail.com 2015-03-01T01:07:08+00:00 bf6f80d994a154f25eb5e8beca5babdf31b13eca BUG: Fixes ndarray.fill to accept maximum uint64 value 
BUG: Fixes ndarray.fill to accept maximum uint64 value
BUG: arr.fill() should accept the max uint64 value 2015-03-01T00:11:34+00:00 John Tyree johntyree@gmail.com 2015-02-28T19:18:43+00:00 11dfe938a485500a94de8c01157ea6319afcffd0 






BUG: solves complex array clip in issue #5354 and added symmetric regression test
2015-02-28T13:15:36+00:00

Maniteja Nandana
manitejanmt@gmail.com

2014-12-21T21:23:39+00:00

102ba699b8b259072c2ba635f70bb2937450ada8












Merge pull request #5599 from pitrou/refleak_ufunc2
2015-02-23T19:23:29+00:00

Julian Taylor
jtaylor.debian@googlemail.com

2015-02-23T19:23:29+00:00

1f72899ac674c9e44c1be2948ad5b2eef008a32f

BUG: Fix a reference leak in ufunc type resolution.





BUG: Fix a reference leak in ufunc type resolution.







BUG: Fix a reference leak in ufunc type resolution.
2015-02-23T19:11:33+00:00

Antoine Pitrou
antoine@python.org

2015-02-23T18:43:05+00:00

50afb0fb67b4b9d1bffa3baf4b87332040c54a70

ensure_dtype_nbo() already creates a new reference.





ensure_dtype_nbo() already creates a new reference.







Merge pull request #5500 from juliantaylor/backports-1.9.2
2015-02-01T16:30:13+00:00

Julian Taylor
juliantaylor108@gmail.com

2015-02-01T16:30:13+00:00

311d93756983beb1c5301ffddf113134415aa764

some backports for 1.9.2




some backports for 1.9.2






MAINT: Get rid of some harmless gcc warnings about macro redefines.
2015-01-27T20:44:09+00:00

Charles Harris
charlesr.harris@gmail.com

2014-08-17T17:14:30+00:00

fb19faceafa3a13f6299cf64d7ea58acdbd9ce00

The Python.h header likes to be included first, otherwise warnings about
redefining "_POSIX_C_SOURCE" and "_XOPEN_SOURCE" are generated. This is
really a problem with the Python.h header, but can be worked around by
changing the order of inclusion.





The Python.h header likes to be included first, otherwise warnings about
redefining "_POSIX_C_SOURCE" and "_XOPEN_SOURCE" are generated. This is
really a problem with the Python.h header, but can be worked around by
changing the order of inclusion.







Merge pull request #5478 from charris/fix-1.9-alignment
2015-01-25T16:31:35+00:00

Julian Taylor
juliantaylor108@gmail.com

2015-01-25T16:31:35+00:00

1cac77b27d10217aaeb468abb71ed49f241ce469

Fix too large alignment of complex types




Fix too large alignment of complex types






BUG: Fix astype for structured array fields of different byte order.
2015-01-22T18:33:55+00:00

Darsh P. Ranjan
darsh.ranjan@here.com

2014-11-10T07:20:16+00:00

1bce8d75a7dd8068adc1c1740c7ed03e71a9b5af

The offending commit is c53b0e4, which introduced two regressions:

- using astype to cast a structured array to one with a different byte
  order no longer works;
- comparing structured-array dtypes can give incorrect results if the
  two dtypes have different byte orders.

This pull request should fix both.

One thing I wasn't sure about is reordering struct fields.  In my
implementation, the `equiv`, `same_kind`, and `safe` rules are now
allowed to reorder fields.  If that isn't desired, though, it's a pretty
easy change.





The offending commit is c53b0e4, which introduced two regressions:

- using astype to cast a structured array to one with a different byte
  order no longer works;
- comparing structured-array dtypes can give incorrect results if the
  two dtypes have different byte orders.

This pull request should fix both.

One thing I wasn't sure about is reordering struct fields.  In my
implementation, the `equiv`, `same_kind`, and `safe` rules are now
allowed to reorder fields.  If that isn't desired, though, it's a pretty
easy change.