From e14e3f143e7260de9581aee27e5a9b2645db72de Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Sebastian Thiel Date: Fri, 11 Jun 2010 16:42:09 +0200 Subject: Removed commented-out debug code and additional debug printings. Verified it works on py2.4, 2.5 and 2.6 --- lib/git/async/pool.py | 6 ------ 1 file changed, 6 deletions(-) (limited to 'lib/git/async/pool.py') diff --git a/lib/git/async/pool.py b/lib/git/async/pool.py index dbc201a9..7ee3e8eb 100644 --- a/lib/git/async/pool.py +++ b/lib/git/async/pool.py @@ -95,10 +95,6 @@ class PoolReader(CallbackReader): # provided enough - its better to have some possibly empty task runs # than having and empty queue that blocks. - # NOTE: TODO: that case is only possible if one Task could be connected - # to multiple input channels in a manner known by the system. Currently - # this is not possible, but should be implemented at some point. - # if the user tries to use us to read from a done task, we will never # compute as all produced items are already in the channel task = self._task_ref() @@ -260,8 +256,6 @@ class Pool(object): # the following loops are kind of unrolled - code duplication # should make things execute faster. Putting the if statements # into the loop would be less code, but ... slower - # DEBUG - # print actual_count, numchunks, chunksize, remainder, task._out_writer.size() if self._num_workers: # respect the chunk size, and split the task up if we want # to process too much. This can be defined per task -- cgit v1.2.1