<feed xmlns='http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom'>
<title>delta/python-markdown.git/tests/misc/em_strong_complex.html, branch inline</title>
<subtitle>github.com: waylan/Python-Markdown.git
</subtitle>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://git.baserock.org/cgit/delta/python-markdown.git/'/>
<entry>
<title>smart_emphasis keyword &gt; legacy_em extension.</title>
<updated>2015-04-22T23:53:49+00:00</updated>
<author>
<name>Waylan Limberg</name>
<email>waylan.limberg@icloud.com</email>
</author>
<published>2015-04-08T01:01:55+00:00</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://git.baserock.org/cgit/delta/python-markdown.git/commit/?id=8dcfb14f705a92d134c3900cb344e3dd5df99d7b'/>
<id>8dcfb14f705a92d134c3900cb344e3dd5df99d7b</id>
<content type='text'>
The smart_strong extension has been removed and its behavior is now the
default (smart em and smart strong are the default). The legacy_em
extension restores legacy behavior.

This completes the removal of keywords.  All parser behavior is now modified
by extensions, not by keywords on the Markdown class.
</content>
<content type='xhtml'>
<div xmlns='http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml'>
<pre>
The smart_strong extension has been removed and its behavior is now the
default (smart em and smart strong are the default). The legacy_em
extension restores legacy behavior.

This completes the removal of keywords.  All parser behavior is now modified
by extensions, not by keywords on the Markdown class.
</pre>
</div>
</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Better nested STRONG EM support.</title>
<updated>2014-09-26T14:29:48+00:00</updated>
<author>
<name>Waylan Limberg</name>
<email>waylan.limberg@icloud.com</email>
</author>
<published>2014-09-25T20:07:07+00:00</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://git.baserock.org/cgit/delta/python-markdown.git/commit/?id=8358bb3c569026d9775859bcdbd2611fc9499420'/>
<id>8358bb3c569026d9775859bcdbd2611fc9499420</id>
<content type='text'>
Fixes #253. Thanks to @facelessuser for the tests. Although I removed
a bunch of weird ones (even some that passed) from his PR (#342). For
the most part, there is no definitive way for those to be parsed. So
there is no point of testing for them. In most of those situations,
authors should be mixing underscores and astericks so it is clear
what is intended.
</content>
<content type='xhtml'>
<div xmlns='http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml'>
<pre>
Fixes #253. Thanks to @facelessuser for the tests. Although I removed
a bunch of weird ones (even some that passed) from his PR (#342). For
the most part, there is no definitive way for those to be parsed. So
there is no point of testing for them. In most of those situations,
authors should be mixing underscores and astericks so it is clear
what is intended.
</pre>
</div>
</content>
</entry>
</feed>
