delta/python-json-patch.git/jsonpatch.py, branch v1.4 github.com: stefankoegl/python-json-patch.git bump version to 1.4 2014-03-22T10:51:53+00:00 Stefan Kögl stefan@skoegl.net 2014-03-22T10:51:53+00:00 02ab1d24f73bec2a87485db70455cdb13f91ace0 






Optimize jsonpatch.make_patch for lists. Fixes #24
2014-03-22T10:37:30+00:00

Alexander Shorin
kxepal@gmail.com

2014-03-22T09:40:45+00:00

cc7bda313ec4a8353f9e00d088fc4f64b9ff1ea9

This optimization tries to work only with really different lists
subsequences and trying to preserve as much as possible common ones.
This reduces overall of generated operations since now it's possible
to simple insertions. Also, it converts pairs of remove-add operations
into single replace (if target path is the same) or move (if target
value is the same).





This optimization tries to work only with really different lists
subsequences and trying to preserve as much as possible common ones.
This reduces overall of generated operations since now it's possible
to simple insertions. Also, it converts pairs of remove-add operations
into single replace (if target path is the same) or move (if target
value is the same).







Catch KeyError when accessing the sub-doc items
2014-02-03T17:21:05+00:00

Lucas Alvares Gomes
lucasagomes@gmail.com

2014-01-22T17:02:42+00:00

ad66344ad6ec13403d90a12e959e980a4f1933dd












allow moving array items into other items in same array
2014-01-11T20:40:29+00:00

Johan Forsberg
johan.forsberg@gmail.com

2014-01-11T20:40:29+00:00

7e459af293954675a5ac9852008666bfd95187ea












Fix equality tests for Python 3.x
2013-11-12T08:44:41+00:00

Alexander Shorin
kxepal@apache.org

2013-11-12T08:44:41+00:00

0c4ec87ced2ab50364f23b90c67637473a017903

Since map() returns generator in 3.x, it's not possible to compare them
without unwrap.





Since map() returns generator in 3.x, it's not possible to compare them
without unwrap.







Keep things simple
2013-11-12T04:42:44+00:00

Alexander Shorin
kxepal@apache.org

2013-11-12T04:42:44+00:00

ed65618d8233be5333d8fd26621d24a0d5d8ac7e












Use new string formatting syntax
2013-11-12T04:21:46+00:00

Alexander Shorin
kxepal@apache.org

2013-11-12T04:21:46+00:00

edf8700771dd69325f4bd4b7d072f26149ff1c41

Python 2.5 support was dropped long ago to care about





Python 2.5 support was dropped long ago to care about







Raise TypeError instead of AssertionError
2013-11-12T04:19:29+00:00

Alexander Shorin
kxepal@apache.org

2013-11-12T04:19:29+00:00

3ab6c5a251110fcf06d3e740e7658fa089c9e1eb












Use reversed(range) is recommended over range with negative step
2013-11-12T04:17:14+00:00

Alexander Shorin
kxepal@apache.org

2013-11-12T04:17:14+00:00

cbe80b0d7cb8ce12d6f65031a4fab9f9398db701

https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-ideas/2013-October/023733.html





https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-ideas/2013-October/023733.html







Fix broken test for Python 2.x
2013-10-28T02:30:05+00:00

Alexander Shorin
kxepal@apache.org

2013-10-28T02:30:05+00:00

3206a73fccb68f9d615b297d6c515848272efc53

Fun fact: for Python 3.x you don't need to explicitly implement __ne__
method if __eq__ exists, but you have do this for 2.x or your objects
may be equal and non-equal at the same time. Seems like, before
refactoring, operator.eq had used right logic.





Fun fact: for Python 3.x you don't need to explicitly implement __ne__
method if __eq__ exists, but you have do this for 2.x or your objects
may be equal and non-equal at the same time. Seems like, before
refactoring, operator.eq had used right logic.