From 332fa27640b1901ac632e6d37a4aa9643d0f8594 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Lorry Tar Creator <lorry-tar-importer@lorry>
Date: Wed, 20 Oct 2021 23:22:45 +0000
Subject: ncurses-6.3

---
 doc/html/Ada95.html | 10 +++++-----
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

(limited to 'doc/html/Ada95.html')

diff --git a/doc/html/Ada95.html b/doc/html/Ada95.html
index 7f4e9f9..8154c3e 100644
--- a/doc/html/Ada95.html
+++ b/doc/html/Ada95.html
@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
 <!--
-  $Id: Ada95.html,v 1.16 2020/02/02 23:34:34 tom Exp $
+  $Id: Ada95.html,v 1.17 2021/09/04 10:52:55 tom Exp $
   ****************************************************************************
-  * Copyright 2019,2020 Thomas E. Dickey                                     *
+  * Copyright 2019-2020,2021 Thomas E. Dickey                                *
   * Copyright 2000-2010,2013 Free Software Foundation, Inc.                  *
   *                                                                          *
   * Permission is hereby granted, free of charge, to any person obtaining a  *
@@ -73,14 +73,14 @@
 
     <li>This is not a typical one-to-one interface mapping. It is
     close to one-to-one on the functional level. Each (n)curses
-    function has it's counterpart with a more or less similar
+    function has its counterpart with a more or less similar
     formal parameter list in the binding. It is not one-to-one with
     respect to the datatypes. I tried to make records out of the
     flat chtype and similar structures, so you don't have to do bit
     operations to mark an attributed character as bold. Just make
     the boolean member <strong>bold</strong> of the record true.
     The binding also hides the structures like WINDOW, PANEL, MENU,
-    FORM etc. ! It's a pure functional API.</li>
+    FORM etc. ! It is a pure functional API.</li>
 
     <li>I try to do as much error checking as possible and feasible
     in the binding. I will raise an Ada exception when something
@@ -107,7 +107,7 @@
 
     <li>Although Ada95 is an OO Language, this binding doesn't
     provide an OO abstraction of the (n)curses functionality. As
-    mentioned above it's a thin binding for the (n)curses
+    mentioned above it is a thin binding for the (n)curses
     functions. But without any doubt it would be nice to build on
     top of this an OO abstraction of (n)curses functionality.<br>
     The only exception is the method how fieldtypes are represented
-- 
cgit v1.2.1