From 0c4d2d95d06e920e0c61707e62c7fffc9c57f63a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Josef Bacik Date: Thu, 5 Apr 2012 15:03:02 -0400 Subject: Btrfs: use i_version instead of our own sequence We've been keeping around the inode sequence number in hopes that somebody would use it, but nobody uses it and people actually use i_version which serves the same purpose, so use i_version where we used the incore inode's sequence number and that way the sequence is updated properly across the board, and not just in file write. Thanks, Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik --- fs/btrfs/btrfs_inode.h | 3 --- 1 file changed, 3 deletions(-) (limited to 'fs/btrfs/btrfs_inode.h') diff --git a/fs/btrfs/btrfs_inode.h b/fs/btrfs/btrfs_inode.h index 9b9b15fd5204..3771b8543a7e 100644 --- a/fs/btrfs/btrfs_inode.h +++ b/fs/btrfs/btrfs_inode.h @@ -83,9 +83,6 @@ struct btrfs_inode { */ u64 generation; - /* sequence number for NFS changes */ - u64 sequence; - /* * transid of the trans_handle that last modified this inode */ -- cgit v1.2.1