delta/linux.git/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_testmod, branch master git.kernel.org: pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git selftests/bpf: Add test to access integer type of variable array 2023-04-20T04:29:39+00:00 Feng Zhou zhoufeng.zf@bytedance.com 2023-04-20T03:27:35+00:00 5ff54dedf35bfee7a16eb9f8fb7ecadf7d5564cb Add prog test for accessing integer type of variable array in tracing program. In addition, hook load_balance function to access sd->span[0], only to confirm whether the load is successful. Because there is no direct way to trigger load_balance call. Co-developed-by: Chengming Zhou <zhouchengming@bytedance.com> Signed-off-by: Chengming Zhou <zhouchengming@bytedance.com> Signed-off-by: Feng Zhou <zhoufeng.zf@bytedance.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230420032735.27760-3-zhoufeng.zf@bytedance.com Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> 
Add prog test for accessing integer type of variable array in tracing
program.
In addition, hook load_balance function to access sd->span[0], only
to confirm whether the load is successful. Because there is no direct
way to trigger load_balance call.

Co-developed-by: Chengming Zhou <zhouchengming@bytedance.com>
Signed-off-by: Chengming Zhou <zhouchengming@bytedance.com>
Signed-off-by: Feng Zhou <zhoufeng.zf@bytedance.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230420032735.27760-3-zhoufeng.zf@bytedance.com
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
selftests/bpf: Fix compiler warnings in bpf_testmod for kfuncs 2023-04-13T12:54:45+00:00 Andrii Nakryiko andrii@kernel.org 2023-04-12T03:46:47+00:00 4099be372faf7b3616634dfe6994b81b1edf1906 Add -Wmissing-prototypes ignore in bpf_testmod.c, similarly to what we do in kernel code proper. Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202304080951.l14IDv3n-lkp@intel.com/ Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20230412034647.3968143-1-andrii@kernel.org 
Add -Wmissing-prototypes ignore in bpf_testmod.c, similarly to what we
do in kernel code proper.

Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202304080951.l14IDv3n-lkp@intel.com/
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20230412034647.3968143-1-andrii@kernel.org
selftests/bpf: Keep the loop in bpf_testmod_loop_test 2023-04-13T12:32:05+00:00 Song Liu song@kernel.org 2023-04-12T21:04:23+00:00 2995f9a8d427b9ff6f3cf4e85c0f9d4456ef324d Some compilers (for example clang-15) optimize bpf_testmod_loop_test and remove the loop: gcc version (gdb) disassemble bpf_testmod_loop_test Dump of assembler code for function bpf_testmod_loop_test: 0x0000000000000570 <+0>: callq 0x575 <bpf_testmod_loop_test+5> 0x0000000000000575 <+5>: xor %eax,%eax 0x0000000000000577 <+7>: test %edi,%edi 0x0000000000000579 <+9>: jle 0x587 <bpf_testmod_loop_test+23> 0x000000000000057b <+11>: xor %edx,%edx 0x000000000000057d <+13>: add %edx,%eax 0x000000000000057f <+15>: add $0x1,%edx 0x0000000000000582 <+18>: cmp %edx,%edi 0x0000000000000584 <+20>: jne 0x57d <bpf_testmod_loop_test+13> 0x0000000000000586 <+22>: retq 0x0000000000000587 <+23>: retq clang-15 version (gdb) disassemble bpf_testmod_loop_test Dump of assembler code for function bpf_testmod_loop_test: 0x0000000000000450 <+0>: nopl 0x0(%rax,%rax,1) 0x0000000000000455 <+5>: test %edi,%edi 0x0000000000000457 <+7>: jle 0x46b <bpf_testmod_loop_test+27> 0x0000000000000459 <+9>: lea -0x1(%rdi),%eax 0x000000000000045c <+12>: lea -0x2(%rdi),%ecx 0x000000000000045f <+15>: imul %rax,%rcx 0x0000000000000463 <+19>: shr %rcx 0x0000000000000466 <+22>: lea -0x1(%rdi,%rcx,1),%eax 0x000000000000046a <+26>: retq 0x000000000000046b <+27>: xor %eax,%eax 0x000000000000046d <+29>: retq Note: The jne instruction is removed in clang-15 version. Force the compile to keep the loop by making sum volatile. Signed-off-by: Song Liu <song@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20230412210423.900851-4-song@kernel.org 
Some compilers (for example clang-15) optimize bpf_testmod_loop_test and
remove the loop:

gcc version
(gdb) disassemble bpf_testmod_loop_test
Dump of assembler code for function bpf_testmod_loop_test:
   0x0000000000000570 <+0>:     callq  0x575 <bpf_testmod_loop_test+5>
   0x0000000000000575 <+5>:     xor    %eax,%eax
   0x0000000000000577 <+7>:     test   %edi,%edi
   0x0000000000000579 <+9>:     jle    0x587 <bpf_testmod_loop_test+23>
   0x000000000000057b <+11>:    xor    %edx,%edx
   0x000000000000057d <+13>:    add    %edx,%eax
   0x000000000000057f <+15>:    add    $0x1,%edx
   0x0000000000000582 <+18>:    cmp    %edx,%edi
   0x0000000000000584 <+20>:    jne    0x57d <bpf_testmod_loop_test+13>
   0x0000000000000586 <+22>:    retq
   0x0000000000000587 <+23>:    retq

clang-15 version
(gdb) disassemble bpf_testmod_loop_test
Dump of assembler code for function bpf_testmod_loop_test:
   0x0000000000000450 <+0>:     nopl   0x0(%rax,%rax,1)
   0x0000000000000455 <+5>:     test   %edi,%edi
   0x0000000000000457 <+7>:     jle    0x46b <bpf_testmod_loop_test+27>
   0x0000000000000459 <+9>:     lea    -0x1(%rdi),%eax
   0x000000000000045c <+12>:    lea    -0x2(%rdi),%ecx
   0x000000000000045f <+15>:    imul   %rax,%rcx
   0x0000000000000463 <+19>:    shr    %rcx
   0x0000000000000466 <+22>:    lea    -0x1(%rdi,%rcx,1),%eax
   0x000000000000046a <+26>:    retq
   0x000000000000046b <+27>:    xor    %eax,%eax
   0x000000000000046d <+29>:    retq

Note: The jne instruction is removed in clang-15 version.

Force the compile to keep the loop by making sum volatile.

Signed-off-by: Song Liu <song@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20230412210423.900851-4-song@kernel.org
bpf/selftests: Test fentry attachment to shadowed functions 2023-03-16T01:38:30+00:00 Viktor Malik vmalik@redhat.com 2023-03-10T07:41:00+00:00 aa3d65de4b9004d799f97700751a86d3ebd7d5f9 Adds a new test that tries to attach a program to fentry of two functions of the same name, one located in vmlinux and the other in bpf_testmod. To avoid conflicts with existing tests, a new function "bpf_fentry_shadow_test" was created both in vmlinux and in bpf_testmod. The previous commit fixed a bug which caused this test to fail. The verifier would always use the vmlinux function's address as the target trampoline address, hence trying to create two trampolines for a single address, which is forbidden. The test (similarly to other fentry/fexit tests) is not working on arm64 at the moment. Signed-off-by: Viktor Malik <vmalik@redhat.com> Acked-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/5fe2f364190b6f79b085066ed7c5989c5bc475fa.1678432753.git.vmalik@redhat.com Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> 
Adds a new test that tries to attach a program to fentry of two
functions of the same name, one located in vmlinux and the other in
bpf_testmod.

To avoid conflicts with existing tests, a new function
"bpf_fentry_shadow_test" was created both in vmlinux and in bpf_testmod.

The previous commit fixed a bug which caused this test to fail. The
verifier would always use the vmlinux function's address as the target
trampoline address, hence trying to create two trampolines for a single
address, which is forbidden.

The test (similarly to other fentry/fexit tests) is not working on arm64
at the moment.

Signed-off-by: Viktor Malik <vmalik@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/5fe2f364190b6f79b085066ed7c5989c5bc475fa.1678432753.git.vmalik@redhat.com
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
selftests/bpf: implement and test custom testmod_seq iterator 2023-03-09T00:19:51+00:00 Andrii Nakryiko andrii@kernel.org 2023-03-08T18:41:21+00:00 7e86a8c4ac8d5dcf7dd58f5a4779d1a6ff0a827d Implement a trivial iterator returning same specified integer value N times as part of bpf_testmod kernel module. Add selftests to validate everything works end to end. We also reuse these tests as "verification-only" tests to validate that kernel prints the state of custom kernel module-defined iterator correctly: fp-16=iter_testmod_seq(ref_id=1,state=drained,depth=0) "testmod_seq" part is an iterator type, and is coming from module's BTF data dynamically at runtime. Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230308184121.1165081-9-andrii@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> 
Implement a trivial iterator returning same specified integer value
N times as part of bpf_testmod kernel module. Add selftests to validate
everything works end to end.

We also reuse these tests as "verification-only" tests to validate that
kernel prints the state of custom kernel module-defined iterator correctly:

  fp-16=iter_testmod_seq(ref_id=1,state=drained,depth=0)

"testmod_seq" part is an iterator type, and is coming from module's BTF
data dynamically at runtime.

Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230308184121.1165081-9-andrii@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
bpf: Add __bpf_kfunc tag to all kfuncs 2023-02-01T23:25:14+00:00 David Vernet void@manifault.com 2023-02-01T17:30:15+00:00 400031e05adfcef9e80eca80bdfc3f4b63658be4 Now that we have the __bpf_kfunc tag, we should use add it to all existing kfuncs to ensure that they'll never be elided in LTO builds. Signed-off-by: David Vernet <void@manifault.com> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Acked-by: Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@google.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20230201173016.342758-4-void@manifault.com 
Now that we have the __bpf_kfunc tag, we should use add it to all
existing kfuncs to ensure that they'll never be elided in LTO builds.

Signed-off-by: David Vernet <void@manifault.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Acked-by: Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@google.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20230201173016.342758-4-void@manifault.com
selftests/bpf: Add bpf_testmod_fentry_* functions 2022-10-25T17:14:51+00:00 Jiri Olsa jolsa@kernel.org 2022-10-25T13:41:46+00:00 fee356ede980b6c2c8db612e18b25738356d6744 Adding 3 bpf_testmod_fentry_* functions to have a way to test kprobe multi link on kernel module. They follow bpf_fentry_test* functions prototypes/code. Adding equivalent functions to all bpf_fentry_test* does not seems necessary at the moment, could be added later. Acked-by: Song Liu <song@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221025134148.3300700-7-jolsa@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> 
Adding 3 bpf_testmod_fentry_* functions to have a way to test
kprobe multi link on kernel module. They follow bpf_fentry_test*
functions prototypes/code.

Adding equivalent functions to all bpf_fentry_test* does not
seems necessary at the moment, could be added later.

Acked-by: Song Liu <song@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221025134148.3300700-7-jolsa@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
selftests/bpf: Add struct argument tests with fentry/fexit programs. 2022-09-07T02:51:14+00:00 Yonghong Song yhs@fb.com 2022-08-31T15:27:13+00:00 1642a3945e223a922312fab2401ecdf58b3825b9 Add various struct argument tests with fentry/fexit programs. Also add one test with a kernel func which does not have any argument to test BPF_PROG2 macro in such situation. Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220831152713.2080039-1-yhs@fb.com Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> 
Add various struct argument tests with fentry/fexit programs.
Also add one test with a kernel func which does not have any
argument to test BPF_PROG2 macro in such situation.

Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220831152713.2080039-1-yhs@fb.com
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
bpf: Switch to new kfunc flags infrastructure 2022-07-22T03:59:42+00:00 Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi memxor@gmail.com 2022-07-21T13:42:35+00:00 a4703e3184320d6e15e2bc81d2ccf1c8c883f9d1 Instead of populating multiple sets to indicate some attribute and then researching the same BTF ID in them, prepare a single unified BTF set which indicates whether a kfunc is allowed to be called, and also its attributes if any at the same time. Now, only one call is needed to perform the lookup for both kfunc availability and its attributes. Signed-off-by: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220721134245.2450-4-memxor@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> 
Instead of populating multiple sets to indicate some attribute and then
researching the same BTF ID in them, prepare a single unified BTF set
which indicates whether a kfunc is allowed to be called, and also its
attributes if any at the same time. Now, only one call is needed to
perform the lookup for both kfunc availability and its attributes.

Signed-off-by: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220721134245.2450-4-memxor@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
selftests/bpf: Add a test for btf_type_tag "percpu" 2022-03-06T02:39:51+00:00 Hao Luo haoluo@google.com 2022-03-04T19:16:57+00:00 50c6b8a9aea2b8dc6c4ffb0cc502b94f7f57a0dc Add test for percpu btf_type_tag. Similar to the "user" tag, we test the following cases: 1. __percpu struct field. 2. __percpu as function parameter. 3. per_cpu_ptr() accepts dynamically allocated __percpu memory. Because the test for "user" and the test for "percpu" are very similar, a little bit of refactoring has been done in btf_tag.c. Basically, both tests share the same function for loading vmlinux and module btf. Example output from log: > ./test_progs -v -t btf_tag libbpf: prog 'test_percpu1': BPF program load failed: Permission denied libbpf: prog 'test_percpu1': -- BEGIN PROG LOAD LOG -- ... ; g = arg->a; 1: (61) r1 = *(u32 *)(r1 +0) R1 is ptr_bpf_testmod_btf_type_tag_1 access percpu memory: off=0 ... test_btf_type_tag_mod_percpu:PASS:btf_type_tag_percpu 0 nsec #26/6 btf_tag/btf_type_tag_percpu_mod1:OK libbpf: prog 'test_percpu2': BPF program load failed: Permission denied libbpf: prog 'test_percpu2': -- BEGIN PROG LOAD LOG -- ... ; g = arg->p->a; 2: (61) r1 = *(u32 *)(r1 +0) R1 is ptr_bpf_testmod_btf_type_tag_1 access percpu memory: off=0 ... test_btf_type_tag_mod_percpu:PASS:btf_type_tag_percpu 0 nsec #26/7 btf_tag/btf_type_tag_percpu_mod2:OK libbpf: prog 'test_percpu_load': BPF program load failed: Permission denied libbpf: prog 'test_percpu_load': -- BEGIN PROG LOAD LOG -- ... ; g = (__u64)cgrp->rstat_cpu->updated_children; 2: (79) r1 = *(u64 *)(r1 +48) R1 is ptr_cgroup_rstat_cpu access percpu memory: off=48 ... test_btf_type_tag_vmlinux_percpu:PASS:btf_type_tag_percpu_load 0 nsec #26/8 btf_tag/btf_type_tag_percpu_vmlinux_load:OK load_btfs:PASS:could not load vmlinux BTF 0 nsec test_btf_type_tag_vmlinux_percpu:PASS:btf_type_tag_percpu 0 nsec test_btf_type_tag_vmlinux_percpu:PASS:btf_type_tag_percpu_helper 0 nsec #26/9 btf_tag/btf_type_tag_percpu_vmlinux_helper:OK Signed-off-by: Hao Luo <haoluo@google.com> Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Acked-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20220304191657.981240-5-haoluo@google.com 
Add test for percpu btf_type_tag. Similar to the "user" tag, we test
the following cases:

 1. __percpu struct field.
 2. __percpu as function parameter.
 3. per_cpu_ptr() accepts dynamically allocated __percpu memory.

Because the test for "user" and the test for "percpu" are very similar,
a little bit of refactoring has been done in btf_tag.c. Basically, both
tests share the same function for loading vmlinux and module btf.

Example output from log:

 > ./test_progs -v -t btf_tag

 libbpf: prog 'test_percpu1': BPF program load failed: Permission denied
 libbpf: prog 'test_percpu1': -- BEGIN PROG LOAD LOG --
 ...
 ; g = arg->a;
 1: (61) r1 = *(u32 *)(r1 +0)
 R1 is ptr_bpf_testmod_btf_type_tag_1 access percpu memory: off=0
 ...
 test_btf_type_tag_mod_percpu:PASS:btf_type_tag_percpu 0 nsec
 #26/6 btf_tag/btf_type_tag_percpu_mod1:OK

 libbpf: prog 'test_percpu2': BPF program load failed: Permission denied
 libbpf: prog 'test_percpu2': -- BEGIN PROG LOAD LOG --
 ...
 ; g = arg->p->a;
 2: (61) r1 = *(u32 *)(r1 +0)
 R1 is ptr_bpf_testmod_btf_type_tag_1 access percpu memory: off=0
 ...
 test_btf_type_tag_mod_percpu:PASS:btf_type_tag_percpu 0 nsec
 #26/7 btf_tag/btf_type_tag_percpu_mod2:OK

 libbpf: prog 'test_percpu_load': BPF program load failed: Permission denied
 libbpf: prog 'test_percpu_load': -- BEGIN PROG LOAD LOG --
 ...
 ; g = (__u64)cgrp->rstat_cpu->updated_children;
 2: (79) r1 = *(u64 *)(r1 +48)
 R1 is ptr_cgroup_rstat_cpu access percpu memory: off=48
 ...
 test_btf_type_tag_vmlinux_percpu:PASS:btf_type_tag_percpu_load 0 nsec
 #26/8 btf_tag/btf_type_tag_percpu_vmlinux_load:OK

 load_btfs:PASS:could not load vmlinux BTF 0 nsec
 test_btf_type_tag_vmlinux_percpu:PASS:btf_type_tag_percpu 0 nsec
 test_btf_type_tag_vmlinux_percpu:PASS:btf_type_tag_percpu_helper 0 nsec
 #26/9 btf_tag/btf_type_tag_percpu_vmlinux_helper:OK

Signed-off-by: Hao Luo <haoluo@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20220304191657.981240-5-haoluo@google.com