From b67bfcb2fb6ab0c7853f052feb7ce8cbe33d2d92 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: brane Date: Mon, 15 Jul 2002 01:25:05 +0000 Subject: *** empty log message *** git-svn-id: http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/apr/apr/trunk@63658 13f79535-47bb-0310-9956-ffa450edef68 --- STATUS | 9 +++++---- 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/STATUS b/STATUS index 11fab736f..5be8e910d 100644 --- a/STATUS +++ b/STATUS @@ -1,5 +1,5 @@ APACHE PORTABLE RUNTIME (APR) LIBRARY STATUS: -*-text-*- -Last modified at [$Date: 2002/07/14 20:32:34 $] +Last modified at [$Date: 2002/07/15 01:25:05 $] Release: @@ -64,7 +64,7 @@ CURRENT VOTES: 1) Keeping the existing apr_time_t names, in spite of confusion with ANSI/C99 time_t's units, and prior decimal usec definition. - +1: rbb, jerenkrantz, striker, dreid, jim, jwoolley + +1: rbb, jerenkrantz, striker, dreid, jim, jwoolley, brane +0: wrowe [apr_types don't promise to map to C99/ANSI units] +0: brianp -1: aaron [veto for reusing the apr_time_t identifier for a new use] @@ -82,7 +82,7 @@ CURRENT VOTES: fielding [prefers apr_utime_t and apr_utimediff_t (64bit)] +0.5: jim -0: jerenkrantz, dreid - -0.5: rbb, jwoolley, striker + -0.5: rbb, jwoolley, striker, brane wrowe [prefers apr_utime_t and apr_uspan_t where u==undefined] 3) Renaming the function to get rid of apr_time_t vs time_t confusion, @@ -91,12 +91,13 @@ CURRENT VOTES: +0.5: wrowe, [prefers apr_time_busec_t and apr_span_busec_t] brianp, [can live with apr_time_busec_t and apr_span_busec_t] fielding [me too] + +0: brane -0: jerenkrantz -0.5: rbb, ianh, dreid, jim, jwoolley, striker 4) Using time_t and struct timeval/tm +1: fielding (if apr_time is not an ADT) - -1: brianp, wrowe, jwoolley + -1: brianp, wrowe, jwoolley, brane [fielding: Is APR time guaranteed to be a scalar quantity? If so, then we must include units as part of the definition of the -- cgit v1.2.1