From ca98e1710e2decb724d57c29ad13537982152ac0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Mike Frysinger Date: Sun, 12 Aug 2012 15:13:10 -0400 Subject: i386/x86_64: punt HAVE_CPP_ASM_DEBUGINFO Pretty sure we require recent enough versions of gcc/binutils to make this check pointless. I can't any logs in the last few years where this check didn't return "yes". Signed-off-by: Mike Frysinger --- config.h.in | 3 --- 1 file changed, 3 deletions(-) (limited to 'config.h.in') diff --git a/config.h.in b/config.h.in index 40b47173e1..e27e86d428 100644 --- a/config.h.in +++ b/config.h.in @@ -46,9 +46,6 @@ /* On powerpc64, use overlapping .opd entries. */ #undef USE_PPC64_OVERLAPPING_OPD -/* Define if the assembler generates debugging information directly. */ -#undef HAVE_CPP_ASM_DEBUGINFO - /* Define if _Unwind_Find_FDE should be exported from glibc. */ #undef EXPORT_UNWIND_FIND_FDE -- cgit v1.2.1