From 1f9c90b81462d0b34c2baa56993e233dfb4b6d01 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Lin Jen-Shin <godfat@godfat.org>
Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2017 20:37:04 +0800
Subject: Disable Rubocop Performance/TimesMap

This cop would complain:

> C: Performance/TimesMap: Use Array.new with a block instead of .times.map.

I don't think this makes sense. What if we really want to have
sequential numbers? We could do: `0.upto(9).map` but how that's
so bad than using `10.times.map`? Performance doesn't really
matter here, we're certainly not running this in a loop. It's
generally used for generating some testing data only.
---
 .rubocop.yml | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/.rubocop.yml b/.rubocop.yml
index d30846e6e0b..39b56e0f952 100644
--- a/.rubocop.yml
+++ b/.rubocop.yml
@@ -713,7 +713,7 @@ Performance/StringReplacement:
 
 # Checks for `.times.map` calls.
 Performance/TimesMap:
-  Enabled: true
+  Enabled: false
 
 # Rails #######################################################################
 
-- 
cgit v1.2.1