Signed-off-by: Rémy Coutable <remy@rymai.me>

When a merge request can only be merged when all discussions are
resolved. This feature allows to easily delegate those discussions to a
new issue, while marking them as resolved in the merge request.

The user is presented with a new issue, prepared with mentions of all
unresolved discussions, including the first unresolved note of the
discussion, time and link to the note.

When the issue is created, the discussions in the merge request will get
a system note directing the user to the newly created issue.

* Added keyword arguments to truncated_diff_lines method to allow for using highlighting or not (html templates vs. text)
* Tweaked templates for consistency and format appropriateness

Previously the `truncated_diff_lines` method for outputting a discussion diff took in already highlighted lines, which meant it wasn't reuseable for truncating ANY lines. In the way it was used, it also meant that for any email truncation, the whole diff was being highlighted before being truncated, meaning wasted time highlighting lines that wouldn't even be used (granted, they were being memoized, so perhaps this wasn't that great of an issue). I refactored truncation away from highlighting, in order to truncate formatted diffs for text templates in email, using `>`s to designate each line, but otherwise retaining the parsing already done to create `diff_lines`.

Additionally, while notes on merge requests or commits had already been tested, there was no existing test for notes on a diff on an MR or commit. Added mailer tests for such, and a unit test for truncating diff lines.

Use `update_all` to only require one query per discussion to
update the notes resolved status. Some changes had to be made to
the discussion spec to accout for the fact that notes are not
individually updated now