DRY code + fix rubocop Add more test cases Append to changelog DRY changes list find_url service for merge_requests use GET for getting merge request links remove files rename to get_url_service reduce loop add test case for cross project refactor tiny thing update changelog
Refactor pipeline creation service ## What does this MR do? This refactors GitLab CI build processing: all builds for pipeline are pre-created when a pipeline object is created. The builds are created with a new introduced status `created`. The builds are then automatically promoted to `pending` when a previous stage do succeed. This significantly simplifies pipeline processing code solving a lot of problems of lazily initialisation of previous approach (builds were created on-demand). ## Why was this MR needed? The previous mechanism had a lot of flows (shown in related issues) in how it work, but also in code design. Removing cross model-service-library dependencies. The current approach moves a build creation to single place `CreatePipelineService` and removes a dynamic dependency on `config_processor` significantly simplifying a build creation and pipeline processing. Pipeline processing is implemented in `ProcessPipelineService`. This also allows to easily extend GitLab with Manual Actions which is part of 8.10 direction issue. ## Migration problem ~~This MR removes the a on-demand creation of builds in pipelines. Pipelines that are running and are in mid-stage (some stages started, but not all) will not be fully evaluated after application restart. This happens, because the code responsible for on-demand creation is removed. There's no easy way to migrate existing pipelines, other than doing offline migration and putting pipeline processing in migration code (which seems to be a really bad idea).~~ To support old pipelines I added a lazy initialization of builds if none is found. ## What are the relevant issue numbers? Fixes: https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/issues/12839 Solves: https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/issues/18644 https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ci-multi-runner/issues/289 Allows to easily implement: https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/issues/17010 ## Does this MR meet the acceptance criteria? - [x] [CHANGELOG](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CHANGELOG) entry added - [x] [Documentation created/updated](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/doc/development/doc_styleguide.md) - [x] API support added - Tests - [x] Added for this feature/bug - [ ] All builds are passing - [x] Conform by the [style guides](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#style-guides) - [x] Branch has no merge conflicts with `master` (if you do - rebase it please) - [ ] [Squashed related commits together](https://git-scm.com/book/en/Git-Tools-Rewriting-History#Squashing-Commits) See merge request !5295
This change simplifies a Pipeline processing by introducing a special new status: created. This status is used for all builds that are created for a pipeline. We are then processing next stages and queueing some of the builds (created -> pending) or skipping them (created -> skipped). This makes it possible to simplify and solve a few ordering problems with how previously builds were scheduled. This also allows us to visualise a full pipeline (with created builds). This also removes an after_touch used for updating a pipeline state parameters. Right now in various places we explicitly call a reload_status! on pipeline to force it to be updated and saved.
Signed-off-by: Rémy Coutable <remy@rymai.me>
Use badge image template instead of using separate images ## What does this MR do? Makes it possible to use template for badge instead of having multiple files. ## Are there points in the code the reviewer needs to double check? We also have a deprecated badge in `controllers/ci/projects_controller.rb`. We decided to leave it until 9.0, so we still have images in `public/ci/` until 9.0. ## Why was this MR needed? We are going to implement build coverage badge, and we do not want to store 101 SVG images for each percentage value. ## What are the relevant issue numbers? #3714 ## Screenshots (if relevant)  ## Does this MR meet the acceptance criteria? - [ ] ~~[CHANGELOG](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CHANGELOG) entry added~~ (refactoring) - [ ] ~~[Documentation created/updated](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/doc/development/doc_styleguide.md)~~ - [ ] ~~API support added~~ - Tests - [x] Added for this feature/bug - [x] All builds are passing - [x] Conform by the [style guides](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#style-guides) - [x] Branch has no merge conflicts with `master` (if you do - rebase it please) - [ ] ~~[Squashed related commits together](https://git-scm.com/book/en/Git-Tools-Rewriting-History#Squashing-Commits)~~ (refactoring) See merge request !5520
Check out GH pull requests locally where the source/target branch had been deleted ## What does this MR do? Check out GitHub pull requests where source/target branches that had been deleted locally rather than temporarily restoring them on GitHub using their References API. This helps us to not get rate limited, and allow us to import cross-repository pull requests (those from forks). ## What are the relevant issue numbers? Fixes #15528 Fixes #17766 Fixes #19310 Fixes #19439 Fixes #19998 Fixes #20153 Fixes #20552 Fixes https://gitlab.com/gitlab-com/support-forum/issues/801 #20385 ## Screenshots (if relevant) ## Does this MR meet the acceptance criteria? - [x] [CHANGELOG](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CHANGELOG) entry added - [x] [Documentation created/updated](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/doc/development/doc_styleguide.md) - [X] ~~API support added~~ - Tests - [x] Added for this feature/bug - [x] All builds are passing - [x] Conform by the [style guides](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#style-guides) - [x] Branch has no merge conflicts with `master` (if you do - rebase it please) - [x] [Squashed related commits together](https://git-scm.com/book/en/Git-Tools-Rewriting-History#Squashing-Commits) See merge request !5630