This commit adds a number of _html columns and, with the exception of Note, starts updating them whenever the content of their partner fields changes. Note has a collision with the note_html attr_accessor; that will be fixed later A background worker for clearing these cache columns is also introduced - use `rake cache:clear` to set it off. You can clear the database or Redis caches separately by running `rake cache:clear:db` or `rake cache:clear:redis`, respectively.
Resolve "`Member.add_user`doesn't detect existing members that have requested access"
## What does this MR do?
This merge request handle the case when an access requester is added to a group or project (via the members page or the API).
In `Member.add_user`, if an access requester already exists, we simply accept their request (and set the `created_by`, `access_level` and `expires_at` attributes if given).
## Are there points in the code the reviewer needs to double check?
I've taken the opportunity to cleanup the whole `{Group,Project}Member.add_user*` methods since it was quite a mess.
## What are the relevant issue numbers?
Closes #21983
See merge request !6393
Changes include: - Ensure Member.add_user is not called directly when not necessary - New GroupMember.add_users_to_group to have the same abstraction level as for Project - Refactor Member.add_user to take a source instead of an array of members - Fix Rubocop offenses - Always use Project#add_user instead of project.team.add_user - Factorize users addition as members in Member.add_users_to_source - Make access_level a keyword argument in GroupMember.add_users_to_group and ProjectMember.add_users_to_projects - Destroy any requester before adding them as a member - Improve the way we handle access requesters in Member.add_user Instead of removing the requester and creating a new member, we now simply accepts their access request. This way, they will receive a "access request granted" email. - Fix error that was previously silently ignored - Stop raising when access level is invalid in Member, let Rails validation do their work Signed-off-by: Rémy Coutable <remy@rymai.me>
Milestone tab badges ### What does this MR do? Adds count badges to the tabs on the Milestone page to mirror the Issue page. ### Are there points in the code the reviewer needs to double check? CSS: Padding was added to the `.milestone` element to make expired milestones look good. ### Why was this MR needed? For consistency with other tabs ### What are the relevant issue numbers? Closes #20114 ### Screenshots (if relevant) **Before** <img src="/uploads/1f75853a863a9058ee409916b7ee4057/Screen_Shot_2016-07-22_at_13.22.20.png" width="362"> **After** <img src="/uploads/8a058290850f571db249dd9b23f5138d/Screen_Shot_2016-07-22_at_13.21.58.png" width="303">   ### Does this MR meet the acceptance criteria? - [x] [CHANGELOG](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CHANGELOG) entry added - [ ] [Documentation created/updated](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/doc/development/doc_styleguide.md) - [ ] API support added - Tests - [x] Added for this feature/bug - [x] All builds are passing - [ ] Conform by the [style guides](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#style-guides) - [x] Branch has no merge conflicts with `master` (if you do - rebase it please) - [ ] [Squashed related commits together](https://git-scm.com/book/en/Git-Tools-Rewriting-History#Squashing-Commits) See merge request !5946
Simplify ProjectTeam#fetch_members to satisfy flog ## What does this MR do? - Add specs for ProjectTeam#fetch_members - Simplify ProjectTeam#fetch_members to satisfy flog ## What are the relevant issue numbers? Closes https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/issues/22200 See merge request !6431