- Pass `developers_and_merge` and `developers_can_push` in `params`
  instead of using keyword arguments.

- Refactor a slightly complex boolean check to a simple `nil?` check.

1. Previously, we were not removing existing access levels before
   creating new ones. This is not a problem for EE, but _is_ for CE,
   since we restrict the number of access levels in CE to 1.

2. The correct approach is:

    CE -> delete all access levels before updating a protected branch
    EE -> delete developer access levels if "developers_can_{merge,push}" is switched off

3. The dispatch is performed by checking if a "length: 1" validation is
   present on the access levels or not.

4. Another source of problems was that we didn't put multiple queries in
   a transaction. If the `destroy_all` passes, but the `update` fails,
   we should have a rollback.

5. Modifying the API to provide users direct access to CRUD access
   levels will make things a lot simpler.

6. Create `create/update` services separately for this API, which
   perform the necessary data translation, before calling the regular
   `create/update` services. The translation code was getting too large
   for the API endpoint itself, so this move makes sense.

1. `GitPushService` was still using `{merge,push}_access_level_attributes` instead
   of `{merge,push}_access_levels_attributes`.

2. The branches API creates access levels regardless of the state of the
   `developers_can_{push,merge}` parameters. This is in line with the UI,
   where Master access is the default for a new protected branch.

3. Use `after(:build)` to create access levels in the
   `protected_branches` factory, so that `factories_spec` passes. It
   only builds records, so we need to create access levels on `build` as
   well.

1. It makes sense to reuse these constants since we had them duplicated
   in the previous enum implementation. This also simplifies our
   `check_access` implementation, because we can use
   `project.team.max_member_access` directly.

2. Use `accepts_nested_attributes_for` to create push/merge access
   levels. This was a bit fiddly to set up, but this simplifies our code
   by quite a large amount. We can even get rid of
   `ProtectedBranches::BaseService`.

3. Move API handling back into the API (previously in
   `ProtectedBranches::BaseService#translate_api_params`.

4. The protected branch services now return a `ProtectedBranch` rather
   than `true/false`.

5. Run `load_protected_branches` on-demand in the `create` action, to
   prevent it being called unneccessarily.

6. "Masters" is pre-selected as the default option for "Allowed to Push"
   and "Allowed to Merge".

7. These changes were based on a review from @rymai in !5081.

1. The new data model moves from `developers_can_{push,merge}` to
   `allowed_to_{push,merge}`.

2. The API interface has not been changed. It still accepts
   `developers_can_push` and `developers_can_merge` as options. These
   attributes are inferred from the new data model.

3. Modify the protected branch create/update services to translate from
   the API interface to our current data model.