Avoid calculation of closes_issues.

## What does this MR do?

Avoid unneeded calls to MR closes issues

## Are there points in the code the reviewer needs to double check?

I'm not sure if calling this method from a view is a good practice, but I cannot see another simple way of avoiding this problem. In case we want to avoid this in the controller we need to specify the action, format and status of the merge request, because in that case we know that the `_open` partial will render. We could add some lazy evaluation but it not a thing I see in use along the app but feedback is welcome

## What are the relevant issue numbers?

#14202 , #19490

## Does this MR meet the acceptance criteria?

- [x] [CHANGELOG](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CHANGELOG) entry added
- ~~[ ] [Documentation created/updated](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/doc/development/doc_styleguide.md)~~
- ~~[ ] API support added~~
- Tests
  - ~~[ ] Added for this feature/bug~~
  - [x] All builds are passing
- [x] Conform by the [style guides](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#style-guides)
- [x] Branch has no merge conflicts with `master` (if you do - rebase it please)
- [x] [Squashed related commits together](https://git-scm.com/book/en/Git-Tools-Rewriting-History#Squashing-Commits)

See merge request !5140

This reverts commit bf2a86b73cce332ff8f4392ffc8df501193f32ec.

This reverts commit 68155ee73b549a4f79744bb325542c29d45c71ea, reversing
changes made to 7ebd011ed1de7aee706f07a53c63c90f1c8aa5d4.

Update time format of pipeline duration

Closes #18181

Part of #18920 

See merge request !5121

Added blank state to issues

## What does this MR do?

Adds new blank state to issues when no issues exist.

Part of #18519 

## Screenshots (if relevant)

![Screen_Shot_2016-06-24_at_16.37.12](/uploads/0c3f385615b29216ef1137bd6fac06af/Screen_Shot_2016-06-24_at_16.37.12.png)

See merge request !4908

New diff notes

Fixes #12732, #14731, #19375, #14783 

Builds on https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/merge_requests/4110

To do:
- [x] Get it mostly working
- [x] Validate position validity
- [x] Fix: Don’t link to `#`
- [x] Fix: Base ref can be `nil`, potentially, when the MR has an oprhan source branch => Yep, doesn’t work. We need to store a `start_id`
- [x] Optimize: Fewer duplicate `git diff` compares
- [x] Optimize: Pass paths to `PositionTracer#diff` for faster diffs
- [x] Refactor: Use `head_id` in `MergeRequest`/`MergeRequestDiff` instead of `source_sha`
- [x] Refactor: Convert existing array-based diff refs to the DiffRefs model
- [x] Tweak: Use `note_type` in `Autosave` key
- [x] Tweak: Remove `line_code: note.line_code` from `link_to_reply_discussion`
- [x] Update: `SentNotifications` and reply-by-email receiver
- [x] Update: MR diff notification email
- [x] Update: API (MR, Commit note creation and entity)
- [x] Update: GitHub importer
- [x] Address any other TODO comments
- [x] Fix: Suppress "edited 4 minutes ago"
- [x] Write tests
  - [x] `LineMapper`
  - [x] `PositionTracer`
  - [x] `Position`
  - [x] `DiffPositionUpdateService`
  - [x] `DiffNote`
  - [x] `MergeRequests::RefreshService` / `MergeRequest#update_diff_notes_positions`
- [x] Make sure commits with diff notes don't get cleaned up, since this would prevent the diff notes from being rendered (https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/merge_requests/5062)

Future improvements:
- Display unresolved comments on files outside the diff, if the comment was added when that file _was_ part of the diff
- Allow commenting on sections between hunks, when expanding the diff using `...`
  - (We'd need to generate line code based on Position if we have it, even if it falls outside bounds of diff)
- `diff_hunk` on diff note API entity
- Show diff hunk in notification email
- Resolved line notes would have a boolean, and be inactive through `notes.any? { !active? || resolved? }`
- Multi line notes would store a number of positions, and do the right thing (™) in grouping and then rendering if the first item is multiline? => true
- Image diff notes could store x,y,width,height instead of old_line,new_line for similar grouping. Does it need a reference to say if it's on old or new? These can't have line_codes, clearly. Rendering would be interesting.
- Show commit line comments in the MR diff
- Comment on specific selected words
- Comment on file header
- Unfold top of discussion diff note
- New diff notes API for commits and MRs

/cc @rspeicher

See merge request !4101

We just need to get merge requests closes issues when 
we’re going to show them