MergeRequest new form load diff asynchronously ## What does this MR do? Don't return diff tab content from the server when request for a new merge request ## Are there points in the code the reviewer needs to double check? ## Why was this MR needed? To avoid 502 errors due to this controller action takes to much time ## What are the relevant issue numbers? Relates #13912 ## Screenshots (if relevant) ## Does this MR meet the acceptance criteria? - [x] [CHANGELOG](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CHANGELOG) entry added - ~~[ ] [Documentation created/updated](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/doc/development/doc_styleguide.md)~~ - ~~[ ] API support added~~ - Tests - [x] Added for this feature/bug - [x] All builds are passing - [x] Conform by the [style guides](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#style-guides) - [x] Branch has no merge conflicts with `master` (if you do - rebase it please) - [x] [Squashed related commits together](https://git-scm.com/book/en/Git-Tools-Rewriting-History#Squashing-Commits) See merge request !5844
Fix broken handling of certain calls in GitHub importer client ## What does this MR do? It changes/fixes the behavior of request handling in GH client. Now it returns the response directly if it's not a collection of resources. Otherwise, it checks for a passed block, if true, then it yield each page to said block, if not, it collects all response in a single array then returns it. Closes #22998 See merge request !6703
API: Use Grape DSL to document access requests and members endpoints Part of #21979, depends on gitlab-org/gitlab-ce!6267 and gitlab-org/gitlab-ce!6266. See merge request !6269
See !6096.
Issue Board API support ## What does this MR do? Adds support for Issue Board in the API. ## Are there points in the code the reviewer needs to double check? ~~Double check whether the Issue Board list movement fix is needed.~~ *Moved to a separate issue.* [#22890](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/issues/22890) ## Why was this MR needed? Currently the API offers partial support to a project's Issue Board indirectly through Labels. This MR adds support for listing, creating, moving and removing board lists. ## Does this MR meet the acceptance criteria? - [X] [CHANGELOG](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CHANGELOG) entry added - [X] [Documentation created/updated](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/doc/development/doc_styleguide.md) - [X] API support added - Tests - [X] Added for this feature/bug - [X] All builds are passing - [X] Conform by the [merge request performance guides](http://docs.gitlab.com/ce/development/merge_request_performance_guidelines.html) - [X] Conform by the [style guides](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#style-guides) - [X] Branch has no merge conflicts with `master` (if you do - rebase it please) - [X] [Squashed related commits together](https://git-scm.com/book/en/Git-Tools-Rewriting-History#Squashing-Commits) ## What are the relevant issue numbers? [#22195](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/issues/22195) See merge request !6646
Signed-off-by: Rémy Coutable <remy@rymai.me>
Gitlab::Redis bigger connection pool on sidekiq workers See merge request !6657
Document GIT_STRATEGY=none ## What does this MR do? Adds documentation for the new `GIT_STRATEGY=none` option in GitLab Runner v1.7 ## Are there points in the code the reviewer needs to double check? Speling and grammar, of course. I'm using the term 'project workspace' to refer to the build directory, which is a Jenkins-ism. Is there preferred alternative wording? ## Why was this MR needed? Discoverability of new feature ## Screenshots (if relevant) ## Does this MR meet the acceptance criteria? - <strike>[ ] [CHANGELOG](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CHANGELOG) entry added</strike> - [x] [Documentation created/updated](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/doc/development/doc_styleguide.md) - <strike>[ ] API support added</strike> - <strike>Tests</strike> - <strike>[ ] Added for this feature/bug</strike> - <strike>[ ] All builds are passing</strike> - <strike>[ ] Conform by the [merge request performance guides](http://docs.gitlab.com/ce/development/merge_request_performance_guidelines.html)</strike> - [ ] Conform by the [style guides](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#style-guides) - [x] Branch has no merge conflicts with `master` (if you do - rebase it please) - [x] [Squashed related commits together](https://git-scm.com/book/en/Git-Tools-Rewriting-History#Squashing-Commits) ## What are the relevant issue numbers? Closes #21337 Depends on http://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ci-multi-runner/merge_requests/332 See merge request !6577