From 4d4fcc5451d9d653bebcc8afa18543cb426abeed Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Nicolas Pitre Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2007 14:57:33 -0400 Subject: relax usage of the progress API Since it is now OK to pass a null pointer to display_progress() and stop_progress() resulting in a no-op, then we can simplify the code and remove a bunch of lines by not making those calls conditional all the time. Signed-off-by: Nicolas Pitre Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano --- builtin-unpack-objects.c | 6 ++---- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) (limited to 'builtin-unpack-objects.c') diff --git a/builtin-unpack-objects.c b/builtin-unpack-objects.c index e0ecbc51a7..1e51865c52 100644 --- a/builtin-unpack-objects.c +++ b/builtin-unpack-objects.c @@ -326,11 +326,9 @@ static void unpack_all(void) obj_list = xmalloc(nr_objects * sizeof(*obj_list)); for (i = 0; i < nr_objects; i++) { unpack_one(i); - if (!quiet) - display_progress(progress, i + 1); + display_progress(progress, i + 1); } - if (!quiet) - stop_progress(&progress); + stop_progress(&progress); if (delta_list) die("unresolved deltas left after unpacking"); -- cgit v1.2.1