From 4262c1b0c38613a8c5ae729bd4d3f18f0df3ec44 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Linus Torvalds Date: Tue, 18 Apr 2006 20:31:41 -0700 Subject: Fix uninteresting tags in new revision parsing When I unified the revision argument parsing, I introduced a simple bug wrt tags that had been marked uninteresting. When it was preparing for the revision walk, it would mark all the parent commits of an uninteresting tag correctly uninteresting, but it would forget about the commit itself. This means that when I just did my 2.6.17-rc2 release, and my scripts generated the log for "v2.6.17-rc1..v2.6.17-rc2", everything was fine, except the commit pointed to by 2.6.17-rc1 (which shouldn't have been there) was included. Even though it should obviously have been marked as being uninteresting. Not a huge deal, and the fix is trivial. Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano --- revision.c | 1 + 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) diff --git a/revision.c b/revision.c index dbd54da5ba..113dd5a89f 100644 --- a/revision.c +++ b/revision.c @@ -152,6 +152,7 @@ static struct commit *handle_commit(struct rev_info *revs, struct object *object if (parse_commit(commit) < 0) die("unable to parse commit %s", name); if (flags & UNINTERESTING) { + commit->object.flags |= UNINTERESTING; mark_parents_uninteresting(commit); revs->limited = 1; } -- cgit v1.2.1