diff options
author | Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com> | 2017-03-24 18:40:57 +0000 |
---|---|---|
committer | Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> | 2017-03-24 12:15:26 -0700 |
commit | ac3f5a346860b824e083c5d305757c3260565475 (patch) | |
tree | b1dfdaaf848507f24dbd84a17936da3482975819 /t/t3201-branch-contains.sh | |
parent | 1e0c3b680c6e7b37fc51bd69a410af01897a4f94 (diff) | |
download | git-ac3f5a346860b824e083c5d305757c3260565475.tar.gz |
ref-filter: add --no-contains option to tag/branch/for-each-ref
Change the tag, branch & for-each-ref commands to have a --no-contains
option in addition to their longstanding --contains options.
This allows for finding the last-good rollout tag given a known-bad
<commit>. Given a hypothetically bad commit cf5c7253e0, the git
version to revert to can be found with this hacky two-liner:
(git tag -l 'v[0-9]*'; git tag -l --contains cf5c7253e0 'v[0-9]*') |
sort | uniq -c | grep -E '^ *1 ' | awk '{print $2}' | tail -n 10
With this new --no-contains option the same can be achieved with:
git tag -l --no-contains cf5c7253e0 'v[0-9]*' | sort | tail -n 10
As the filtering machinery is shared between the tag, branch &
for-each-ref commands, implement this for those commands too. A
practical use for this with "branch" is e.g. finding branches which
were branched off between v2.8.0 and v2.10.0:
git branch --contains v2.8.0 --no-contains v2.10.0
The "describe" command also has a --contains option, but its semantics
are unrelated to what tag/branch/for-each-ref use --contains for. A
--no-contains option for "describe" wouldn't make any sense, other
than being exactly equivalent to not supplying --contains at all,
which would be confusing at best.
Add a --without option to "tag" as an alias for --no-contains, for
consistency with --with and --contains. The --with option is
undocumented, and possibly the only user of it is
Junio (<xmqqefy71iej.fsf@gitster.mtv.corp.google.com>). But it's
trivial to support, so let's do that.
The additions to the the test suite are inverse copies of the
corresponding --contains tests. With this change --no-contains for
tag, branch & for-each-ref is just as well tested as the existing
--contains option.
In addition to those tests, add a test for "tag" which asserts that
--no-contains won't find tree/blob tags, which is slightly
unintuitive, but consistent with how --contains works & is documented.
Signed-off-by: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Diffstat (limited to 't/t3201-branch-contains.sh')
-rwxr-xr-x | t/t3201-branch-contains.sh | 54 |
1 files changed, 51 insertions, 3 deletions
diff --git a/t/t3201-branch-contains.sh b/t/t3201-branch-contains.sh index daa3ae82b7..0ef1b6fdcc 100755 --- a/t/t3201-branch-contains.sh +++ b/t/t3201-branch-contains.sh @@ -1,6 +1,6 @@ #!/bin/sh -test_description='branch --contains <commit>, --merged, and --no-merged' +test_description='branch --contains <commit>, --no-contains <commit> --merged, and --no-merged' . ./test-lib.sh @@ -45,6 +45,22 @@ test_expect_success 'branch --contains master' ' ' +test_expect_success 'branch --no-contains=master' ' + + git branch --no-contains=master >actual && + >expect && + test_cmp expect actual + +' + +test_expect_success 'branch --no-contains master' ' + + git branch --no-contains master >actual && + >expect && + test_cmp expect actual + +' + test_expect_success 'branch --contains=side' ' git branch --contains=side >actual && @@ -55,6 +71,16 @@ test_expect_success 'branch --contains=side' ' ' +test_expect_success 'branch --no-contains=side' ' + + git branch --no-contains=side >actual && + { + echo " master" + } >expect && + test_cmp expect actual + +' + test_expect_success 'branch --contains with pattern implies --list' ' git branch --contains=master master >actual && @@ -65,6 +91,14 @@ test_expect_success 'branch --contains with pattern implies --list' ' ' +test_expect_success 'branch --no-contains with pattern implies --list' ' + + git branch --no-contains=master master >actual && + >expect && + test_cmp expect actual + +' + test_expect_success 'side: branch --merged' ' git branch --merged >actual && @@ -126,7 +160,9 @@ test_expect_success 'branch --no-merged with pattern implies --list' ' test_expect_success 'implicit --list conflicts with modification options' ' test_must_fail git branch --contains=master -d && - test_must_fail git branch --contains=master -m foo + test_must_fail git branch --contains=master -m foo && + test_must_fail git branch --no-contains=master -d && + test_must_fail git branch --no-contains=master -m foo ' @@ -136,7 +172,8 @@ test_expect_success 'Assert that --contains only works on commits, not trees & b Some blob EOF ) && - test_must_fail git branch --contains $blob + test_must_fail git branch --contains $blob && + test_must_fail git branch --no-contains $blob ' # We want to set up a case where the walk for the tracking info @@ -168,4 +205,15 @@ test_expect_success 'branch --merged with --verbose' ' test_i18ncmp expect actual ' +test_expect_success 'branch --contains combined with --no-contains' ' + git branch --contains zzz --no-contains topic >actual && + cat >expect <<-\EOF && + master + side + zzz + EOF + test_cmp expect actual + +' + test_done |