From 0cbd9fae9d5efccad7957422704b007bf85cc3b9 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Vincent Torri Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2011 23:07:54 +0000 Subject: From: Vincent Torri To: enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: Re: [E-devel] E SVN: discomfitor trunk/eet/src/lib Date: Sat, 30 Jul 2011 00:54:04 +0200 (CEST) On Fri, 29 Jul 2011, Enlightenment SVN wrote: > Log: > I blame this one on raster funny to make a spelling mistake in a sentence where the word 'dictionnary' is used :) Vincent HOW RIGHT YOU ARE! SVN revision: 61912 --- src/lib/Eet.h | 2 +- src/lib/eet_data.c | 2 +- src/lib/eet_lib.c | 2 +- 3 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/lib/Eet.h b/src/lib/Eet.h index 3499d97..7a722bf 100644 --- a/src/lib/Eet.h +++ b/src/lib/Eet.h @@ -2466,7 +2466,7 @@ eet_data_descriptor3_new(const Eet_Data_Descriptor_Class *eddc); * a network or more. * * This function specially ignores str_direct_alloc and str_direct_free. It - * is useful when the eet_data you are reading doesn't have a dictionnary, + * is useful when the eet_data you are reading doesn't have a dictionary, * like network stream or IPC. It also mean that all string will be allocated * and duplicated in memory. * diff --git a/src/lib/eet_data.c b/src/lib/eet_data.c index dc608a8..5ae1256 100644 --- a/src/lib/eet_data.c +++ b/src/lib/eet_data.c @@ -1576,7 +1576,7 @@ _eet_descriptor_hash_find(Eet_Data_Descriptor *edd, if (!edd->elements.hash.buckets[hash].element) return NULL; /* - When we use the dictionnary as a source for chunk name, we will always + When we use the dictionary as a source for chunk name, we will always have the same pointer in name. It's a good idea to just compare pointer instead of running strcmp on both string. */ diff --git a/src/lib/eet_lib.c b/src/lib/eet_lib.c index 9fe73c1..6ee10c4 100644 --- a/src/lib/eet_lib.c +++ b/src/lib/eet_lib.c @@ -566,7 +566,7 @@ eet_flush2(Eet_File *ef) } } - /* write dictionnary */ + /* write dictionary */ if (ef->ed) { int offset = strings_offset; -- cgit v1.2.1