From de4ae3d4869e88dda8bfbad24880cb398160a7a0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Victor Stinner <victor.stinner@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 4 Dec 2016 22:59:09 +0100
Subject: Backed out changeset b9c9691c72c5

Issue #28858: The change b9c9691c72c5 introduced a regression. It seems like
_PyObject_CallArg1() uses more stack memory than
PyObject_CallFunctionObjArgs().
---
 Objects/odictobject.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

(limited to 'Objects/odictobject.c')

diff --git a/Objects/odictobject.c b/Objects/odictobject.c
index 77fb3a181d..22b1f1dfed 100644
--- a/Objects/odictobject.c
+++ b/Objects/odictobject.c
@@ -1256,7 +1256,7 @@ odict_copy(register PyODictObject *od)
     if (PyODict_CheckExact(od))
         od_copy = PyODict_New();
     else
-        od_copy = _PyObject_CallNoArg((PyObject *)Py_TYPE(od));
+        od_copy = PyObject_CallFunctionObjArgs((PyObject *)Py_TYPE(od), NULL);
     if (od_copy == NULL)
         return NULL;
 
-- 
cgit v1.2.1