From 173f11da5dae76c504dac3606c27b74673ccfee4 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: "Michael W. Hudson" Date: Tue, 5 Nov 2002 15:28:51 +0000 Subject: Some days, I think my comment of /* this is harder to get right than you might think */ angered some God somewhere. After noticing >>> range(5000000)[slice(96360, None, 439)] [] I found that my cute test for the slice being empty failed due to overflow. Fixed, and added simple test (not the above!). --- Lib/test/test_slice.py | 3 +++ 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+) (limited to 'Lib/test') diff --git a/Lib/test/test_slice.py b/Lib/test/test_slice.py index 7b3ee067ba..49ed20eb70 100644 --- a/Lib/test/test_slice.py +++ b/Lib/test/test_slice.py @@ -1,6 +1,7 @@ # tests for slice objects; in particular the indices method. from test.test_support import vereq +import sys vereq(slice(None ).indices(10), (0, 10, 1)) vereq(slice(None, None, 2).indices(10), (0, 10, 2)) @@ -11,3 +12,5 @@ vereq(slice(3, None, -2).indices(10), (3, -1, -2)) vereq(slice(-100, 100 ).indices(10), slice(None).indices(10)) vereq(slice(100, -100, -1).indices(10), slice(None, None, -1).indices(10)) vereq(slice(-100L, 100L, 2L).indices(10), (0, 10, 2)) + +vereq(range(10)[::sys.maxint - 1], [0]) -- cgit v1.2.1