From 35035bc35a9cb8617ab9fe9aac38aaf67c926aef Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: "Miss Islington (bot)" <31488909+miss-islington@users.noreply.github.com> Date: Sat, 31 Jul 2021 18:31:44 -0700 Subject: bpo-34013: Don't consider a grouped expression when reporting legacy print syntax errors (GH-27521) (cherry picked from commit 208a7e957b812ad3b3733791845447677a704f3e) Co-authored-by: Pablo Galindo Salgado --- Lib/test/test_exceptions.py | 9 +++++++++ 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+) (limited to 'Lib/test/test_exceptions.py') diff --git a/Lib/test/test_exceptions.py b/Lib/test/test_exceptions.py index 8ffebebaeb..339801ebae 100644 --- a/Lib/test/test_exceptions.py +++ b/Lib/test/test_exceptions.py @@ -182,6 +182,15 @@ class ExceptionTests(unittest.TestCase): s = 'exec f(a+b,c)' ckmsg(s, "Missing parentheses in call to 'exec'. Did you mean exec(...)?") + # Check that we don't incorrectly identify '(...)' as an expression to the right + # of 'print' + + s = 'print (a+b,c) $ 42' + ckmsg(s, "invalid syntax") + + s = 'exec (a+b,c) $ 42' + ckmsg(s, "invalid syntax") + # should not apply to subclasses, see issue #31161 s = '''if True:\nprint "No indent"''' ckmsg(s, "expected an indented block after 'if' statement on line 1", IndentationError) -- cgit v1.2.1