# This testcase is part of GDB, the GNU debugger. # Copyright 1996-2022 Free Software Foundation, Inc. # This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify # it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by # the Free Software Foundation; either version 3 of the License, or # (at your option) any later version. # # This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful, # but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of # MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the # GNU General Public License for more details. # # You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License # along with this program. If not, see . # Some targets can't call functions, so don't even bother with this # test. if [target_info exists gdb,cannot_call_functions] { unsupported "this target can not call functions" return } standard_testfile .c # Regex matching any value of `char' type like: a = 65 'A' set anychar_re {-?[0-9]{1,3} '(.|\\([0-7]{3}|[a-z]|\\|'))'} set skip_float_test [gdb_skip_float_test] # Compile a variant of structs.c using TYPES to specify the type of # the first N struct elements (the remaining elements take the type of # the last TYPES field). Run the compmiled program up to "main". # Also updates the global "testfile" to reflect the most recent build. set first 1 proc start_structs_test { types } { global testfile global srcfile global binfile global subdir global srcdir global gdb_prompt global anychar_re global first # Create the additional flags set flags "debug" set testfile "structs" set n 0 for {set n 0} {$n<[llength ${types}]} {incr n} { set m [I2A ${n}] set t [lindex ${types} $n] lappend flags "additional_flags=-Dt${m}=${t}" append testfile "-" "$t" } set binfile [standard_output_file ${testfile}] if { [prepare_for_testing "failed to prepare" $binfile $srcfile $flags] } { return -1 } # Make certain that the output is consistent gdb_test_no_output "set print sevenbit-strings" gdb_test_no_output "set print address off" gdb_test_no_output "set width 0" gdb_test_no_output "set print elements 300" # Advance to main if {![runto_main]} { return } # Get the debug format get_debug_format # Limit the slow $anychar_re{256} matching for better performance. if $first { set first 0 # Verify $anychar_re can match all the values of `char' type. gdb_breakpoint [gdb_get_line_number "chartest-done"] gdb_continue_to_breakpoint "chartest-done" ".*chartest-done.*" gdb_test_sequence "p chartest" "" \ [concat \ [list "= \{"] \ [lrepeat 255 "^\{c = ${anychar_re}\}, "] \ [list "^\{c = ${anychar_re}\}\}"]] } # check that at the struct containing all the relevant types is correct set foo_t "type = struct struct[llength ${types}] \{" for {set n 0} {$n<[llength ${types}]} {incr n} { append foo_t "\[\r\n \]+[lindex ${types} $n] [i2a $n];" } append foo_t "\[\r\n \]+\}" gdb_test "ptype foo[llength ${types}]" "${foo_t}" \ "ptype foo[llength ${types}]; ${testfile}" } # The expected value for fun${n}, L${n} and foo${n}. First element is # empty to make indexing easier. "foo" returns the modified value, # "zed" returns the invalid value. proc foo { n } { return [lindex { "{}" "{a = 49 '1'}" "{a = 97 'a', b = 50 '2'}" "{a = 49 '1', b = 98 'b', c = 51 '3'}" "{a = 97 'a', b = 50 '2', c = 99 'c', d = 52 '4'}" "{a = 49 '1', b = 98 'b', c = 51 '3', d = 100 'd', e = 53 '5'}" "{a = 97 'a', b = 50 '2', c = 99 'c', d = 52 '4', e = 101 'e', f = 54 '6'}" "{a = 49 '1', b = 98 'b', c = 51 '3', d = 100 'd', e = 53 '5', f = 102 'f', g = 55 '7'}" "{a = 97 'a', b = 50 '2', c = 99 'c', d = 52 '4', e = 101 'e', f = 54 '6', g = 103 'g', h = 56 '8'}" "{a = 49 '1', b = 98 'b', c = 51 '3', d = 100 'd', e = 53 '5', f = 102 'f', g = 55 '7', h = 104 'h', i = 57 '9'}" "{a = 97 'a', b = 50 '2', c = 99 'c', d = 52 '4', e = 101 'e', f = 54 '6', g = 103 'g', h = 56 '8', i = 105 'i', j = 65 'A'}" "{a = 49 '1', b = 98 'b', c = 51 '3', d = 100 'd', e = 53 '5', f = 102 'f', g = 55 '7', h = 104 'h', i = 57 '9', j = 106 'j', k = 66 'B'}" "{a = 97 'a', b = 50 '2', c = 99 'c', d = 52 '4', e = 101 'e', f = 54 '6', g = 103 'g', h = 56 '8', i = 105 'i', j = 65 'A', k = 107 'k', l = 67 'C'}" "{a = 49 '1', b = 98 'b', c = 51 '3', d = 100 'd', e = 53 '5', f = 102 'f', g = 55 '7', h = 104 'h', i = 57 '9', j = 106 'j', k = 66 'B', l = 108 'l', m = 68 'D'}" "{a = 97 'a', b = 50 '2', c = 99 'c', d = 52 '4', e = 101 'e', f = 54 '6', g = 103 'g', h = 56 '8', i = 105 'i', j = 65 'A', k = 107 'k', l = 67 'C', m = 109 'm', n = 69 'E'}" "{a = 49 '1', b = 98 'b', c = 51 '3', d = 100 'd', e = 53 '5', f = 102 'f', g = 55 '7', h = 104 'h', i = 57 '9', j = 106 'j', k = 66 'B', l = 108 'l', m = 68 'D', n = 110 'n', o = 70 'F'}" "{a = 97 'a', b = 50 '2', c = 99 'c', d = 52 '4', e = 101 'e', f = 54 '6', g = 103 'g', h = 56 '8', i = 105 'i', j = 65 'A', k = 107 'k', l = 67 'C', m = 109 'm', n = 69 'E', o = 111 'o', p = 71 'G'}" "{a = 49 '1', b = 98 'b', c = 51 '3', d = 100 'd', e = 53 '5', f = 102 'f', g = 55 '7', h = 104 'h', i = 57 '9', j = 106 'j', k = 66 'B', l = 108 'l', m = 68 'D', n = 110 'n', o = 70 'F', p = 112 'p', q = 72 'H'}" } $n] } proc zed { n } { return [lindex { "{}" "{a = 90 'Z'}" "{a = 90 'Z', b = 90 'Z'}" "{a = 90 'Z', b = 90 'Z', c = 90 'Z'}" "{a = 90 'Z', b = 90 'Z', c = 90 'Z', d = 90 'Z'}" "{a = 90 'Z', b = 90 'Z', c = 90 'Z', d = 90 'Z', e = 90 'Z'}" "{a = 90 'Z', b = 90 'Z', c = 90 'Z', d = 90 'Z', e = 90 'Z', f = 90 'Z'}" "{a = 90 'Z', b = 90 'Z', c = 90 'Z', d = 90 'Z', e = 90 'Z', f = 90 'Z', g = 90 'Z'}" "{a = 90 'Z', b = 90 'Z', c = 90 'Z', d = 90 'Z', e = 90 'Z', f = 90 'Z', g = 90 'Z', h = 90 'Z'}" "{a = 90 'Z', b = 90 'Z', c = 90 'Z', d = 90 'Z', e = 90 'Z', f = 90 'Z', g = 90 'Z', h = 90 'Z', i = 90 'Z'}" "{a = 90 'Z', b = 90 'Z', c = 90 'Z', d = 90 'Z', e = 90 'Z', f = 90 'Z', g = 90 'Z', h = 90 'Z', i = 90 'Z', j = 90 'Z'}" "{a = 90 'Z', b = 90 'Z', c = 90 'Z', d = 90 'Z', e = 90 'Z', f = 90 'Z', g = 90 'Z', h = 90 'Z', i = 90 'Z', j = 90 'Z', k = 90 'Z'}" "{a = 90 'Z', b = 90 'Z', c = 90 'Z', d = 90 'Z', e = 90 'Z', f = 90 'Z', g = 90 'Z', h = 90 'Z', i = 90 'Z', j = 90 'Z', k = 90 'Z', l = 90 'Z'}" "{a = 90 'Z', b = 90 'Z', c = 90 'Z', d = 90 'Z', e = 90 'Z', f = 90 'Z', g = 90 'Z', h = 90 'Z', i = 90 'Z', j = 90 'Z', k = 90 'Z', l = 90 'Z', m = 90 'Z'}" "{a = 90 'Z', b = 90 'Z', c = 90 'Z', d = 90 'Z', e = 90 'Z', f = 90 'Z', g = 90 'Z', h = 90 'Z', i = 90 'Z', j = 90 'Z', k = 90 'Z', l = 90 'Z', m = 90 'Z', n = 90 'Z'}" "{a = 90 'Z', b = 90 'Z', c = 90 'Z', d = 90 'Z', e = 90 'Z', f = 90 'Z', g = 90 'Z', h = 90 'Z', i = 90 'Z', j = 90 'Z', k = 90 'Z', l = 90 'Z', m = 90 'Z', n = 90 'Z', o = 90 'Z'}" "{a = 90 'Z', b = 90 'Z', c = 90 'Z', d = 90 'Z', e = 90 'Z', f = 90 'Z', g = 90 'Z', h = 90 'Z', i = 90 'Z', j = 90 'Z', k = 90 'Z', l = 90 'Z', m = 90 'Z', n = 90 'Z', o = 90 'Z', p = 90 'Z'}" "{a = 90 'Z', b = 90 'Z', c = 90 'Z', d = 90 'Z', e = 90 'Z', f = 90 'Z', g = 90 'Z', h = 90 'Z', i = 90 'Z', j = 90 'Z', k = 90 'Z', l = 90 'Z', m = 90 'Z', n = 90 'Z', o = 90 'Z', p = 90 'Z', q = 90 'Z'}" } $n] } proc any { n } { global anychar_re set ac $anychar_re return [lindex [list \ "{}" \ "{a = ${ac}}" \ "{a = ${ac}, b = ${ac}}" \ "{a = ${ac}, b = ${ac}, c = ${ac}}" \ "{a = ${ac}, b = ${ac}, c = ${ac}, d = ${ac}}" \ "{a = ${ac}, b = ${ac}, c = ${ac}, d = ${ac}, e = ${ac}}" \ "{a = ${ac}, b = ${ac}, c = ${ac}, d = ${ac}, e = ${ac}, f = ${ac}}" \ "{a = ${ac}, b = ${ac}, c = ${ac}, d = ${ac}, e = ${ac}, f = ${ac}, g = ${ac}}" \ "{a = ${ac}, b = ${ac}, c = ${ac}, d = ${ac}, e = ${ac}, f = ${ac}, g = ${ac}, h = ${ac}}" \ "{a = ${ac}, b = ${ac}, c = ${ac}, d = ${ac}, e = ${ac}, f = ${ac}, g = ${ac}, h = ${ac}, i = ${ac}}" \ "{a = ${ac}, b = ${ac}, c = ${ac}, d = ${ac}, e = ${ac}, f = ${ac}, g = ${ac}, h = ${ac}, i = ${ac}, j = ${ac}}" \ "{a = ${ac}, b = ${ac}, c = ${ac}, d = ${ac}, e = ${ac}, f = ${ac}, g = ${ac}, h = ${ac}, i = ${ac}, j = ${ac}, k = ${ac}}" \ "{a = ${ac}, b = ${ac}, c = ${ac}, d = ${ac}, e = ${ac}, f = ${ac}, g = ${ac}, h = ${ac}, i = ${ac}, j = ${ac}, k = ${ac}, l = ${ac}}" \ "{a = ${ac}, b = ${ac}, c = ${ac}, d = ${ac}, e = ${ac}, f = ${ac}, g = ${ac}, h = ${ac}, i = ${ac}, j = ${ac}, k = ${ac}, l = ${ac}, m = ${ac}}" \ "{a = ${ac}, b = ${ac}, c = ${ac}, d = ${ac}, e = ${ac}, f = ${ac}, g = ${ac}, h = ${ac}, i = ${ac}, j = ${ac}, k = ${ac}, l = ${ac}, m = ${ac}, n = ${ac}}" \ "{a = ${ac}, b = ${ac}, c = ${ac}, d = ${ac}, e = ${ac}, f = ${ac}, g = ${ac}, h = ${ac}, i = ${ac}, j = ${ac}, k = ${ac}, l = ${ac}, m = ${ac}, n = ${ac}, o = ${ac}}" \ "{a = ${ac}, b = ${ac}, c = ${ac}, d = ${ac}, e = ${ac}, f = ${ac}, g = ${ac}, h = ${ac}, i = ${ac}, j = ${ac}, k = ${ac}, l = ${ac}, m = ${ac}, n = ${ac}, o = ${ac}, p = ${ac}}" \ "{a = ${ac}, b = ${ac}, c = ${ac}, d = ${ac}, e = ${ac}, f = ${ac}, g = ${ac}, h = ${ac}, i = ${ac}, j = ${ac}, k = ${ac}, l = ${ac}, m = ${ac}, n = ${ac}, o = ${ac}, p = ${ac}, q = ${ac}}" \ ] $n] } # Given N (0..25), return the corresponding alphabetic letter in lower # or upper case. This is ment to be i18n proof. proc i2a { n } { return [string range "abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz" $n $n] } proc I2A { n } { return [string toupper [i2a $n]] } # Use the file name, compiler and tuples to set up any needed KFAILs. proc setup_compiler_kfails { file compiler format tuples bug } { global testfile if {[string match $file $testfile] && [test_compiler_info $compiler] && [test_debug_format $format]} { foreach f $tuples { setup_kfail $bug $f } } } # Test GDB's ability to make inferior function calls to functions # returning (or passing in a single structs. # N identifies the number of elements in the struct that will be used # for the test case. FAILS is a list of target tuples that will fail # this test. # start_structs_test() will have previously built a program with a # specified combination of types for those elements. To ensure # robustness of the output, "p/c" is used. # This tests the code paths "which return-value convention?" and # "extract return-value from registers" called by "infcall.c". proc test_struct_calls { n } { global testfile global gdb_prompt # Check that GDB can always extract a struct-return value from an # inferior function call. Since GDB always knows the location of an # inferior function call's return value these should never fail # Implemented by calling the parameterless function "fun$N" and then # examining the return value printed by GDB. set tests "call $n ${testfile}" # Call fun${n}, checking the printed return-value. setup_compiler_kfails structs-tc-tll gcc-3-3-* "DWARF \[0-9\]" i*86-*-* gdb/1455 setup_compiler_kfails structs-tc-td gcc-3-3-* "DWARF \[0-9\]" i*86-*-* gdb/1455 gdb_test "p/c fun${n}()" "[foo ${n}]" "p/c fun(); ${tests}" # Check that GDB can always pass a structure to an inferior function. # This test can never fail. # Implemented by calling the one parameter function "Fun$N" which # stores its parameter in the global variable "L$N". GDB then # examining that global to confirm that the value is as expected. gdb_test_no_output "call Fun${n}(foo${n})" "call Fun(foo); ${tests}" setup_compiler_kfails structs-tc-tll gcc-3-3-* "DWARF \[0-9\]" i*86-*-* gdb/1455 setup_compiler_kfails structs-tc-td gcc-3-3-* "DWARF \[0-9\]" i*86-*-* gdb/1455 gdb_test "p/c L${n}" [foo ${n}] "p/c L; ${tests}" } # Test GDB's ability to both return a function (with "return" or # "finish") and correctly extract/store any corresponding # return-value. # Check that GDB can consistently extract/store structure return # values. There are two cases - returned in registers and returned in # memory. For the latter case, the return value can't be found and a # failure is "expected". However GDB must still both return the # function and display the final source and line information. # N identifies the number of elements in the struct that will be used # for the test case. FAILS is a list of target tuples that will fail # this test. # This tests the code paths "which return-value convention?", "extract # return-value from registers", and "store return-value in registers". # Unlike "test struct calls", this test is expected to "fail" when the # return-value is in memory (GDB can't find the location). The test # is in three parts: test "return"; test "finish"; check that the two # are consistent. GDB can sometimes work for one command and not the # other. proc test_struct_returns { n } { global gdb_prompt global testfile set tests "return $n ${testfile}" # Check that "return" works. # GDB must always force the return of a function that has # a struct result. Dependant on the ABI, it may, or may not be # possible to store the return value in a register. # The relevant code looks like "L{n} = fun{n}()". The test forces # "fun{n}" to "return" with an explicit value. Since that code # snippet will store the returned value in "L{n}" the return # is tested by examining "L{n}". This assumes that the # compiler implemented this as fun{n}(&L{n}) and hence that when # the value isn't stored "L{n}" remains unchanged. Also check for # consistency between this and the "finish" case. # Get into a call of fun${n} gdb_test "advance fun${n}" \ "fun${n} .*\[\r\n\]+\[0-9\].*return foo${n}.*" \ "advance to fun for return; ${tests}" # Check that the program invalidated the relevant global. gdb_test "p/c L${n}" " = [zed $n]" "zed L for return; ${tests}" # Force the "return". This checks that the return is always # performed, and that GDB correctly reported this to the user. # GDB 6.0 and earlier, when the return-value's location wasn't # known, both failed to print a final "source and line" and misplaced # the frame ("No frame"). # The test is writen so that it only reports one FAIL/PASS for the # entire operation. The value returned is checked further down. # "return_value_known", if non-zero, indicates that GDB knew where # the return value was located. set test "return foo; ${tests}" set return_value_known 1 set return_value_unimplemented 0 gdb_test_multiple "return foo${n}" "${test}" { -re "The location" { # Ulgh, a struct return, remember this (still need prompt). set return_value_known 0 exp_continue } -re "A structure or union" { # Ulgh, a struct return, remember this (still need prompt). set return_value_known 0 # Double ulgh. Architecture doesn't use return_value and # hence hasn't implemented small structure return. set return_value_unimplemented 1 exp_continue } -re "Make fun${n} return now.*y or n. $" { gdb_test_multiple "y" "${test}" { -re "L${n} *= fun${n}.*${gdb_prompt} $" { # Need to step off the function call gdb_test "next" "L.* *= fun.*" "${test}" } -re "L[expr ${n} + 1] *= fun[expr ${n} + 1].*${gdb_prompt} $" { pass "${test}" } } } } # Check that the return-value is as expected. At this stage we're # just checking that GDB has returned a value consistent with # "return_value_known" set above. # # Note that, when return_value_known is false, we can't make any # assumptions at all about the value L: # # - If the caller passed the address of L directly as fun's # return value buffer, then L will be unchanged, because we # forced fun to return before it could store anything in it. # # - If the caller passed the address of some temporary buffer to # fun, and then copied the buffer into L, then L will # have been overwritten with whatever garbage was in the # uninitialized buffer. # # - However, if the temporary buffer just happened to have the # "right" value of foo in it, then L will, in fact, have # the value you'd expect to see if the 'return' had worked! # This has actually been observed to happen on the Renesas M32C. # # So, really, anything is acceptable unless return_value_known is # true. set test "value foo returned; ${tests}" gdb_test_multiple "p/c L${n}" "${test}" { -re " = [foo ${n}].*${gdb_prompt} $" { # This answer is okay regardless of whether GDB claims to # have set the return value: if it did, then this is what # we expected; and if it didn't, then any answer is okay. pass "${test}" } -re " = [any $n].*${gdb_prompt} $" { if $return_value_known { # This contradicts the above claim that GDB knew # the location of the return value. fail "${test}" } else { # We expected L${n} to be set to garbage, so any # answer is acceptable. pass "${test}" } } -re ".*${gdb_prompt} $" { if $return_value_unimplemented { # What a suprize. The architecture hasn't implemented # return_value, and hence has to fail. kfail "$test" gdb/1444 } else { fail "$test" } } } # Check that a "finish" works. # This is almost but not quite the same as "call struct funcs". # Architectures can have subtle differences in the two code paths. # The relevant code snippet is "L{n} = fun{n}()". The program is # advanced into a call to "fun{n}" and then that function is # finished. The returned value that GDB prints, reformatted using # "p/c", is checked. # Get into "fun${n}()". gdb_test "advance fun${n}" \ "fun${n} .*\[\r\n\]+\[0-9\].*return foo${n}.*" \ "advance to fun for finish; ${tests}" # Check that the program invalidated the relevant global. gdb_test "p/c L${n}" " = [zed $n]" "zed L for finish; ${tests}" # Finish the function, set 'finish_value_known" to non-empty if # the return-value was found. set test "finish foo; ${tests}" set finish_value_known 1 gdb_test_multiple "finish" "${test}" { -re "Value returned is .*${gdb_prompt} $" { pass "${test}" } -re "Value returned has type: struct struct$n. Cannot determine contents.*${gdb_prompt} $" { # Expected bad value. For the moment this is ok. set finish_value_known 0 pass "${test}" } } # Re-print the last (return-value) using the more robust # "p/c". If no return value was found, the 'Z' from the previous # check that the variable was cleared, is printed. set test "value foo finished; ${tests}" gdb_test_multiple "p/c" "${test}" { -re "[foo ${n}]\[\r\n\]+${gdb_prompt} $" { if $finish_value_known { pass "${test}" } else { # This contradicts the above claim that GDB didn't # know the location of the return-value. fail "${test}" } } -re "[zed ${n}]\[\r\n\]+${gdb_prompt} $" { # The value didn't get found. This is "expected". if $finish_value_known { # This contradicts the above claim that GDB did # know the location of the return-value. fail "${test}" } else { pass "${test}" } } } # Finally, check that "return" and finish" have consistent # behavior. # Since "finish" works in more cases than "return" (see # RETURN_VALUE_ABI_RETURNS_ADDRESS and # RETURN_VALUE_ABI_PRESERVES_ADDRESS), the "return" value being # known implies that the "finish" value is known (but not the # reverse). set test "return value known implies finish value known; ${tests}" if {$return_value_known && ! $finish_value_known} { kfail gdb/1444 "${test}" } else { pass "${test}" } } # ABIs pass anything >8 or >16 bytes in memory but below that things # randomly use register and/and structure conventions. Check all # possible sized char structs in that range. But only a restricted # range of the other types. # NetBSD/PPC returns "unnatural" (3, 5, 6, 7) sized structs in memory. # Test every single char struct from 1..17 in size. This is what the # original "structs" test was doing. proc test { types c r } { with_test_prefix types=[join $types "-"] { if { [start_structs_test $types] } { return } if { [llength $c] == 0 } { # Done. } elseif { [llength $c] == 1 } { test_struct_calls [lindex $c 0] } elseif { [llength $c] == 2 } { set low_c [lindex $c 0] set high_c [lindex $c 1] for {set i $low_c} {$i <= $high_c} {incr i} { test_struct_calls $i } } else { error "invalid list length" } if { [llength $r] == 0 } { # Done. } elseif { [llength $r] == 1 } { test_struct_returns [lindex $r 0] } elseif { [llength $r] == 2 } { set low_r [lindex $r 0] set high_r [lindex $r 1] for {set i $low_r} {$i <= $high_r} {incr i} { test_struct_returns $i } } else { error "invalid list length" } } } test { tc } {1 17} {1 8} # Let the fun begin. # Assuming that any integer struct larger than 8 bytes goes in memory, # come up with many and varied combinations of a return struct. For # "struct calls" test just beyond that 8 byte boundary, for "struct # returns" test up to that boundary. # For floats, assumed that up to two struct elements can be stored in # floating point registers, regardless of their size. # The approx size of each structure it is computed assumed that tc=1, # ts=2, ti=4, tl=4, tll=8, tf=4, td=8, tld=16, and that all fields are # naturally aligned. Padding being added where needed. # Approx size: 2, 4, ... test { ts } {1 5} {1 4} # Approx size: 4, 8, ... test { ti } {1 3} {1 2} # Approx size: 4, 8, ... test { tl } {1 3} {1 2} # Approx size: 8, 16, ... test { tll } {1 2} {1} if { !$skip_float_test } { # Approx size: 4, 8, ... test { tf } {1 3} {1 2} # Approx size: 8, 16, ... test { td } {1 2} {1} # Approx size: 16, 32, ... test { tld } {1 2} {1} } # Approx size: 2+1=3, 4, ... test { ts tc } {2 8} {2} # Approx size: 4+1=5, 6, ... test { ti tc } {2 6} {2} # Approx size: 4+1=5, 6, ... test { tl tc } {2 6} {2} # Approx size: 8+1=9, 10, ... test { tll tc } {2} {} if { !$skip_float_test } { # Approx size: 4+1=5, 6, ... test { tf tc } {2 6} {2} # Approx size: 8+1=9, 10, ... test { td tc } {2} {} # Approx size: 16+1=17, 18, ... test { tld tc } {2} {} } # Approx size: (1+1)+2=4, 6, ... test { tc ts } {2 6} {2} # Approx size: (1+3)+4=8, 12, ... test { tc ti } {2 4} {2} # Approx size: (1+3)+4=8, 12, ... test { tc tl } {2 4} {2} # Approx size: (1+7)+8=16, 24, ... test { tc tll } {2} {} if { !$skip_float_test } { # Approx size: (1+3)+4=8, 12, ... test { tc tf } {2 4} {} # Approx size: (1+7)+8=16, 24, ... test { tc td } {2} {} # Approx size: (1+15)+16=32, 48, ... test { tc tld } {2} {} # Some float combinations # Approx size: 8+4=12, 16, ... test { td tf } {2} {2} # Approx size: (4+4)+8=16, 32, ... test { tf td } {2} {2} } return 0