From 560e09e9cc912370081be5cccb8d3179a78928b2 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Nick Clifton <nickc@redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 20 Aug 2003 08:37:19 +0000
Subject: Better handking for unresolved symbols
---
bfd/elf64-sh64.c | 6 +++++-
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
(limited to 'bfd/elf64-sh64.c')
diff --git a/bfd/elf64-sh64.c b/bfd/elf64-sh64.c
index 2abf3c135a2..e0bc8df7e5d 100644
--- a/bfd/elf64-sh64.c
+++ b/bfd/elf64-sh64.c
@@ -1610,6 +1610,8 @@ sh_elf64_relocate_section (bfd *output_bfd ATTRIBUTE_UNUSED,
}
else
{
+ /* ??? Could we use the RELOC_FOR_GLOBAL_SYMBOL macro here ? */
+
/* Section symbols are never (?) placed in the hash table, so
we can just ignore hash relocations when creating a
relocatable object file. */
@@ -1699,7 +1701,9 @@ sh_elf64_relocate_section (bfd *output_bfd ATTRIBUTE_UNUSED,
}
else if (h->root.type == bfd_link_hash_undefweak)
relocation = 0;
- else if (info->shared && !info->symbolic && !info->no_undefined)
+ else if (info->shared
+ && !info->symbolic
+ && info->unresolved_syms_in_objects == RM_IGNORE)
relocation = 0;
else
{
--
cgit v1.2.1