From ddd7d8257c786e3284d021a8cf157fe7a547fa41 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Sam Thursfield Date: Wed, 1 Jul 2015 15:35:44 +0100 Subject: schema: Add note about CamelCase Change-Id: Ie7e011c1ceb11df1a1f232ed8d4ee8fcfd26c13f --- schema/baserock-owl-schema.turtle | 5 +++++ 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+) diff --git a/schema/baserock-owl-schema.turtle b/schema/baserock-owl-schema.turtle index 42dafba8..1c34d947 100644 --- a/schema/baserock-owl-schema.turtle +++ b/schema/baserock-owl-schema.turtle @@ -9,6 +9,11 @@ # this schema is a useful step towards doing that. +# NOTE: I absolutely HATE CamelCase but it seems to be the convention for RDF +# property names. I'm undecided on whether it's worse to condemning everyone +# to using stupidCamelCaseNames for things, or worse to make a schema that is +# inconsistent with the rest of the Linked Data world. + # Things you can do with this: # Check it is valid: -- cgit v1.2.1